ArticleInfection2021
Fungal infections of the feet in patients with erysipelas of the lower limb: is it a significant clinical problem?
Article in Infection, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tinea pedis: an updated review.Drugs in context · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundErysipelas is a bacterial infection of the superficial layers of the skin usually caused by Group A Streptococci, often seen in clinical practice. Fungal infections of the feet and elderly age are some of the most significant risk factors for the infection. The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of fungal infections from different regions of the feet in patients with erysipelas.
methods56 patients with clinically diagnosed erysipelas and 56 healthy individuals were clinically examined and tested for fungal infection in three locations: toenails, interdigital space, and soles. The collected samples were evaluated under a microscope and then mycological cultures on Sabouraud's medium were prepared. After 4 weeks of incubation, the cultures were analysed with the identification of particular pathogens.
results42.9% (24/56) of the patients with erysipelas had positive mycological cultures. Toenails and interdigital spaces (both 62.5%) were the most frequently affected areas, followed by soles (37.5%). The most common pathogen was T. rubrum (43.18%), followed by Candida spp. (27.27%), and T. mentagrophytes var.interdigitale (13.63%). Only 14.3% (8/56) of the samples taken from the control group were positive and T.rubrum was the only type of fungus cultured.
conclusionsFungal infections of the feet are important risk factors for the first episode as well as recurrent erysipelas. Prevention and early treatment of fungal infections, especially in elderly people, can significantly reduce the incidence of erysipelas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.