ArticleNeuroradiology2021
Reliability and accuracy of 3-mm and 2-mm maximum intensity projection CT angiography to detect intracranial large vessel occlusion in patients with acute anterior cerebral circulation stroke.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Encoding 3D information in 2D feature maps for brain CT-Angiography.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2025Article
- Emerging Detection Techniques for Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Scoping Review.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the reliability and accuracy of thick maximum intensity projection (MIP) CTA images to detect large-vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation in patients with acute stroke.
methodsA total of 140 acute stroke patients (41 with and 99 without LVO) were evaluated by two neuroradiologists for LVO using axial 3-mm and 2-mm MIPs.
resultsInterobserver agreement was substantial using 3-mm MIPs (ĸ = 0.67) and almost perfect using 2-mm MIPs (ĸ = 0.82). Using 3-mm MIPs, sensitivities were 80.5% and 68.3%, with specificities of 98.0% and 96.0%. Using 2-mm MIPs, sensitivities were 82.9% and 73.2%, with specificities of 98.0% and 99.0%. Sensitivity and specificity of 3 mm and 2 mm MIPs were not statistically significantly different (P ≥ 0.375). The majority of LVOs in the distal intracranial carotid artery, and/or M1-segment were correctly identified: 96.0% (observer 1, 3-mm MIPs), 88.0% (observer 2, 3-mm MIPs), 96.0% (observer 1, 2-mm MIPs), and 96.0% (observer 2, 2 mm MIPs). Using 3-mm MIP images, observers 1 and 2 missed 7/15 (46.7%) and 9/15 (60.0%) of isolated M2-segment occlusions, respectively. Using 2-mm MIP images, observers 1 and 2 missed 5/15 (33.3%) and 6/15 (40.0%) of isolated M2-segment occlusions, respectively.
conclusionThick (2-3 mm) axial MIPs are not useful to detect proximal LVO in the anterior circulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.