Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33533911›Full record

Observational studyQJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians2021

The value of telephone consultations during COVID-19 pandemic. An observational study.

F Martos-Pérez, M D Martín-Escalante, J Olalla-Sierra, J L Prada-Pardal, M D García-de-Lucas, R González-Vega, A Jiménez-Puente, J García-Alegría

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Rural-Urban Differences in Telehealth Utilization and Delayed Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

F Martos-PérezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Costa del Sol, Autovía A-7 Km 187, 29603 Marbella, Spain.
M D Martín-EscalanteDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Costa del Sol, Autovía A-7 Km 187, 29603 Marbella, Spain.
J Olalla-SierraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Costa del Sol, Autovía A-7 Km 187, 29603 Marbella, Spain.
J L Prada-PardalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Costa del Sol, Autovía A-7 Km 187, 29603 Marbella, Spain.
M D García-de-LucasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Costa del Sol, Autovía A-7 Km 187, 29603 Marbella, Spain.
R González-VegaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Costa del Sol, Autovía A-7 Km 187, 29603 Marbella, Spain.
A Jiménez-PuenteEvaluation Department, Hospital Costa del Sol, Autovía A-7 Km 187, 29603 Marbella, Spain.
J García-AlegríaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Costa del Sol, Autovía A-7 Km 187, 29603 Marbella, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany Spanish hospitals converted scheduled in-person visits to telephone visits during the COVID-19 lockdown. There is scarce information about the performance of those visits.

aimTo compare telephone visits during the COVID-19 lockdown period with previous in-person visits.

designRetrospective descriptive study.

methodsTelephone visits from 15 March to 31 May 2020 were compared with in-person visits during the same period in 2019. MAIN MEASURES: The proportions of both groups were compared in term of failure to contact patient, requested diagnostic tests/referrals, discharges, admissions and emergency visits within 30-60 days. A sample of patients, and all participating physicians completed surveys. Z-score test was used (statistical significance P<0.05).

resultsA total of 5602 telephone visits were conducted. In comparison to in-person visits, telephone visits showed higher rates of visit compliance (95.9% vs. 85.2%, P<0.001) and discharges (22.12% vs. 11.82%; P<0.001), and lower number of ancillary tests and referrals. During the 30- and 60-day periods following the telephone visit, a reduction of 52% and 47% in the combined number of emergency department visits and hospital admissions was observed compared to in-person visits (P<0.01). Of the 120 patients surveyed, 95% were satisfied/very satisfied with the telephone visits. Of the 26 physicians, 84.6% considered telephone visits were useful to prioritize patients.

conclusionsDuring health emergencies, previously scheduled outpatient in-person visits can be converted to telephone visits, reducing absenteeism, increasing the rate of discharges and reducing ancillary tests and referrals without increasing the rate of hospital admissions or emergency department visits.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Telephone

Identifiers

PMID33533911
PMCPMC7928558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.