Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33533728›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021

Adapting Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) to Assess Clinical Semantic Textual Similarity: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.

Klaus Kades, Jan Sellner, Gregor Koehler, Peter M Full, T Y Emmy Lai, Jens Kleesiek, Klaus H Maier-Hein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Utility of Language Models in Cardiology: A Narrative Review of the Benefits and Concerns of ChatGPT-4.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Klaus Kades *German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9387-9944
Jan Sellner *German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4469-8343
Gregor KoehlerGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5263-6786
Peter M FullGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4326-8026
T Y Emmy LaiGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5396-3543
Jens Kleesiek *German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8686-0682
Klaus H Maier-Hein *German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6626-2463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNatural Language Understanding enables automatic extraction of relevant information from clinical text data, which are acquired every day in hospitals. In 2018, the language model Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) was introduced, generating new state-of-the-art results on several downstream tasks. The National NLP Clinical Challenges (n2c2) is an initiative that strives to tackle such downstream tasks on domain-specific clinical data. In this paper, we present the results of our participation in the 2019 n2c2 and related work completed thereafter.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to optimally leverage BERT for the task of assessing the semantic textual similarity of clinical text data.

methodsWe used BERT as an initial baseline and analyzed the results, which we used as a starting point to develop 3 different approaches where we (1) added additional, handcrafted sentence similarity features to the classifier token of BERT and combined the results with more features in multiple regression estimators, (2) incorporated a built-in ensembling method, M-Heads, into BERT by duplicating the regression head and applying an adapted training strategy to facilitate the focus of the heads on different input patterns of the medical sentences, and (3) developed a graph-based similarity approach for medications, which allows extrapolating similarities across known entities from the training set. The approaches were evaluated with the Pearson correlation coefficient between the predicted scores and ground truth of the official training and test dataset.

resultsWe improved the performance of BERT on the test dataset from a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.859 to 0.883 using a combination of the M-Heads method and the graph-based similarity approach. We also show differences between the test and training dataset and how the two datasets influenced the results.

conclusionsWe found that using a graph-based similarity approach has the potential to extrapolate domain specific knowledge to unseen sentences. We observed that it is easily possible to obtain deceptive results from the test dataset, especially when the distribution of the data samples is different between training and test datasets.

Indexed as

clinical text miningNational NLP Clinical ChallengesNatural Language Processingsemantic textual similarity

Identifiers

PMID33533728
PMCPMC7889424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.