Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33533127›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2021

Opposing prognostic relevance of junction plakoglobin in distinct prostate cancer patient subsets.

Tanja Spethmann, Lukas Clemens Böckelmann, Vera Labitzky, Ann-Kristin Ahlers, Jennifer Schröder-Schwarz, Sarah Bonk, Ronald Simon, Guido Sauter, Hartwig Huland, Robert Kypta and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Tanja SpethmannInstitute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Lukas Clemens BöckelmannInstitute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0851-7480
Vera LabitzkyInstitute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Ann-Kristin AhlersInstitute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Jennifer Schröder-SchwarzInstitute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Sarah BonkGeneral, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery Department, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Ronald SimonInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0158-4258
Guido SauterInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Hartwig HulandMartini-Klinik, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Robert KyptaDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK.
Udo SchumacherInstitute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Tobias LangeInstitute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DECIC bioGUNE · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both oncogenic and tumor suppressor functions have been described for junction plakoglobin (JUP), also known as γ-catenin. To clarify the role of JUP in prostate cancer, JUP protein expression was immunohistochemically detected in a tissue microarray containing 11 267 individual prostatectomy specimens. Considering all patients, high JUP expression was associated with adverse tumor stage (P = 0.0002), high Gleason grade (P < 0.0001), and lymph node metastases (P = 0.011). These associations were driven mainly by the subset without TMPRSS2:ERG fusion, in which high JUP expression was an independent predictor of poor prognosis (multivariate analyses, P = 0.0054) and early biochemical recurrence (P = 0.0003). High JUP expression was further linked to strong androgen receptor expression (P < 0.0001), high cell proliferation, and PTEN and FOXP1 deletion (P < 0.0001). In the ERG-negative subset, high JUP expression was additionally linked to MAP3K7 (P = 0.0007) and CHD1 deletion (P = 0.0021). Contrasting the overall prognostic effect of JUP, low JUP expression indicated poor prognosis in the fraction of CHD1-deleted patients (P = 0.039). In this subset, the association of high JUP and high cell proliferation was specifically absent. In conclusion, the controversial biological roles of JUP are reflected by antagonistic prognostic effects in distinct prostate cancer patient subsets.

Indexed as

Oncogene Proteins, FusionProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorForkhead Transcription Factorsgamma CateninHumansMalePrognosisRepressor ProteinsTissue Array AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXP1 protein, humangamma CateninJUP protein, humanOncogene Proteins, FusionRepressor Proteinscell adhesionCHD1ERGjunction plakoglobinprostate cancerWNT signaling

Identifiers

PMID33533127
PMCPMC8253102
OpenAlexW3128994693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.