Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33533077›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2021

The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on working practices of UK primary care optometrists.

Manbir Nagra, Peter M Allen, Yvonne Norgett, Eldre Beukes, Michael Bowen, Marta Vianya-Estopa

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The impact of COVID-19 on soft contact lens wear in established European and US markets.Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on working practices of UK primary care optometrists.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manbir NagraVision and Eye Research Institute (VERI), Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3517-7493
Peter M AllenVision and Hearing Sciences Research Centre, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4536-7215
Yvonne NorgettVision and Hearing Sciences Research Centre, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6827-0432
Eldre BeukesVision and Hearing Sciences Research Centre, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9434-9160
Michael BowenThe College of Optometrists, London, UK.
Marta Vianya-EstopaVision and Hearing Sciences Research Centre, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5913-0764
Anglia Ruskin University · GBCollege of Optometrists · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn late 2019, a new coronavirus capable of infecting humans, SARS-CoV-2, was identified in Wuhan, China. The resultant respiratory disease was subsequently named COVID-19. In March 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care optometry practices only remained open to deliver essential or emergency eye care. This study aimed to characterise the experiences of United Kingdom (UK)-based primary care optometrists during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsAn email invitation to participate in an online cross-sectional survey was sent to 3000 UK-based, currently practicing members of The College of Optometrists (UK). Responses to the structured questionnaire were analysed using descriptive statistics, including frequencies, means and standard deviations. Frequency analyses were used to evaluate items with multiple responses. Free-text responses were examined using thematic analyses.

resultsAfter data cleaning, a total of 1250 responses remained. Sixty-three percent were female, 70% self-identified as being of white ethnicity and 78% were based in England. During the first national lockdown, over half of all respondents were involved with the provision of remote consultations for emergency/urgent care. The majority felt 'very'/'moderately' comfortable conducting remote consultations, but 66% felt professional liability was increased. Forty percent were involved in the provision of face-to-face consultations. Eye-health and vision-related problems were the most commonly reported patient issues during both remote and face-to-face consultations, while contact-lens related problems were the least. Thematic analysis of the responses showed several challenges adjusting to the pandemic (e.g., working safely), but also some potential benefits (e.g., increased skills).

conclusionsThe findings provide an overview of changes to optometric practice in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results may be used to inform the development of professional guidance and facilitate resource allocation for safe and effective eye care during this and any future pandemics.

Indexed as

PandemicsCommunicable Disease ControlComorbidityCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesEye DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleOptometristsPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationUnited KingdomCOVID-19infection controloptometryPPEtelehealth

Identifiers

PMID33533077
PMCPMC8013371
OpenAlexW3129038991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.