Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33532992›Full record

ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2021

Role of traditional CHO PET parameters in distinguishing IDH, TERT and MGMT alterations in primary diffuse gliomas.

Ziren Kong, Yucheng Zhang, Delin Liu, Penghao Liu, Yixin Shi, Yaning Wang, Dachun Zhao, Xin Cheng, Yu Wang, Wenbin Ma

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A bis-boron boramino acid PET tracer for brain tumor diagnosis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A histogram of [EJNMMI research · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Imaging Findings ofNuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ziren KongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
Yucheng Zhang *Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Delin Liu *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
Penghao LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
Yixin ShiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
Yaning WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
Dachun ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
Xin ChengDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, China. pumch_chengxin@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7836-8724
Yu WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, China. ywang@pumch.cn.
Wenbin MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing Dongcheng District, Beijing, China. mawb2001@hotmail.com.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation 19JCZDJC64200(Z)Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation 7202150National Natural Science Foundation of China 81201121Peking Union Medical College 2016-I2M-2-001Peking Union Medical College 2018-I2M-3-001Peking Union Medical College Hospital 2019ZLH101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIsocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation and O

methodsTwenty-eight patients who were histopathologically diagnosed with primary diffuse glioma and underwent presurgical CHO PET/CT were retrospectively analyzed, and IDH, TERT and MGMT alterations were examined. The volume of interest (VOI) was semiautomatically defined based on standardized uptake value (SUV) thresholds, and 5 traditional CHO parameters, namely, SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion CHO uptake (TLC) and tumor-to-normal contralateral cortex activity ratio (T/N ratio), were calculated. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to evaluate the differences and performances of the CHO parameters, and their capability to stratify patient prognosis was also evaluated.

resultsAll 5 parameters were significantly higher in IDH-wildtype gliomas than in IDH-mutant gliomas (p = 0.0001-0.037), and SUVmax, SUVmean, TLC and the T/N ratio exhibited good performances in distinguishing the IDH status (areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) 0.856-0.918, accuracies 0.857-0.893) as well as stratifying patient prognosis. Although the differences and performances of the traditional parameters in distinguishing diverse TERT and MGMT statuses were moderate in the whole population, the T/N ratio and TLC displayed certain predictive value in discriminating the TERT status in the IDH-mutant and IDH-wildtype subgroups (p = 0.028-0.048, AUCs 0.857-0.860, accuracies 0.800-0.917, respectively).

conclusionsTraditional CHO PET parameters are capable of distinguishing IDH but not TERT or MGMT alterations in the whole population. In accordance with the clinical understanding of TERT promoter mutations, the T/N ratio and TLC can also discriminate the TERT status in IDH subgroups.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCholineDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedMutationPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisPromoter Regions, GeneticBiomarkers, TumorCholineDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMGMT protein, humanTelomeraseTERT protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsCHO PETGliomaIDHMGMTTERT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.