Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33532977›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021

Subtotal Cholecystectomy After Failed Critical View of Safety Is an Effective and Safe Bail Out Strategy.

Mariana Chávez-Villa, Ismael Dominguez-Rosado, Rodrigo Figueroa-Méndez, Aldair De Los Santos-Pérez, Miguel Angel Mercado

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariana Chávez-VillaDepartment of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ismael Dominguez-RosadoDepartment of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico. ismaeldominguez83@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5940-4208
Rodrigo Figueroa-MéndezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Belisario Domínguez, Sección XVI, 14080, Tlalpan, Mexico City, México.
Aldair De Los Santos-PérezDepartment of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Miguel Angel MercadoDepartment of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBile duct injury (BDI) is accompanied by significant morbidity and long-term impact in quality of life. Subtotal cholecystectomy (STC) is an alternative to prevent this outcome but is associated with other complications. The aim of this work is to demonstrate that BDI associated morbidity exceeds STC associated morbidity, underscoring STC as a reasonable bail out strategy.

methodsWe compared 115 patients who underwent STC with 293 patients who were referred to our center with BDI type E1-E3 and underwent surgical repair. The groups were comparable because in both instances the surgeon had the opportunity to decide not to perform a total cholecystectomy once critical view of safety (CVS) was not achieved.

resultsBile leakage was found in 21% of the STC group with only one BDI (0.9%). More Accordion ≥ 4 were found in the STC group (10.4% vs 4.8%, p = 0.035); however, reoperations were more frequent in the BDI group (8.2% vs 0.9%, p = 0.006). No patient in the STC group required reintervention for completion cholecystectomy. After 3.8 years follow-up, 2.4% of patients had secondary biliary cirrhosis in the BDI group; none in the STC group.

conclusionsDespite complications of STC, morbidity associated with BDI is much higher due to high long-term reoperation rate, in addition to secondary biliary cirrhosis. STC is a safe alternative that can prevent BDI if properly and timely performed in the context of difficult cholecystectomy.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicQuality of LifeBile DuctsCholecystectomyHumansRetrospective StudiesBail out strategyBile duct injuryDifficult gallbladderSubtotal cholecystectomy

Identifiers

PMID33532977
OpenAlexW3128783961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.