Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33532975›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021

Six artificial intelligence paradigms for tissue characterisation and classification of non-COVID-19 pneumonia against COVID-19 pneumonia in computed tomography lungs.

Luca Saba, Mohit Agarwal, Anubhav Patrick, Anudeep Puvvula, Suneet K Gupta, Alessandro Carriero, John R Laird, George D Kitas, Amer M Johri, Antonella Balestrieri and 13 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Deep learning framework for rapid and accurate respiratory COVID-19 prediction using chest X-ray images.Journal of King Saud University. Computer and information sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. COVLIAS 1.0Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 13 institutions in 5 countries.

Luca SabaDepartment of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Di Cagliari, Monserrato (Cagliari), Italy.
Mohit AgarwalCSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, UP, India.
Anubhav PatrickCSE Department, KIET Group of Institutions, Delhi, NCR, India.
Anudeep PuvvulaAnnu's Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, Nellore, AP, India.
Suneet K GuptaCSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, UP, India.
Alessandro CarrieroDepartment of Radiology, A.O.U. Maggiore D.C. University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
John R LairdHeart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA.
George D KitasAcademic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK.
Amer M JohriDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Antonella BalestrieriDepartment of Radiology, A.O.U. Maggiore D.C. University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Zeno FalaschiDepartment of Radiology, A.O.U. Maggiore D.C. University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Alessio PaschèDepartment of Radiology, A.O.U. Maggiore D.C. University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Vijay ViswanathanMV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India.
Ayman El-BazBiomedical Engineering Department, Louisville, KY, USA.
Iqbal AlamDepartment of Physiology, HIMSR, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.
Abhinav JainDepartment of Radiology, HIMSR, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.
Subbaram NaiduElectrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, USA.
Ronald OberleitnerBehavior Imaging, Boise, ID, USA.
Narendra N KhannaDepartment of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
Arindam BitDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Raipur, Raipur, India.
Mostafa FatemiDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA.
Azra AlizadDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jasjit S SuriStroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA. jasjit.suri@atheropoint.com.
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITBennett University · INJamia Hamdard · INMayo Clinic · USAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Cagliari · ITCT Group Of Institutions · INDudley Group NHS Foundation Trust · GBM.V. Hospital for Diabetes and Diabetes Research Centre · INNational Institute of Technology Raipur · INQueen's University · CASt. Helena Hospital · USUniversity of Louisville · USUniversity of Minnesota, Duluth · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 pandemic has currently no vaccines. Thus, the only feasible solution for prevention relies on the detection of COVID-19-positive cases through quick and accurate testing. Since artificial intelligence (AI) offers the powerful mechanism to automatically extract the tissue features and characterise the disease, we therefore hypothesise that AI-based strategies can provide quick detection and classification, especially for radiological computed tomography (CT) lung scans. METHODOLOGY: Six models, two traditional machine learning (ML)-based (k-NN and RF), two transfer learning (TL)-based (VGG19 and InceptionV3), and the last two were our custom-designed deep learning (DL) models (CNN and iCNN), were developed for classification between COVID pneumonia (CoP) and non-COVID pneumonia (NCoP). K10 cross-validation (90% training: 10% testing) protocol on an Italian cohort of 100 CoP and 30 NCoP patients was used for performance evaluation and bispectrum analysis for CT lung characterisation.

resultsUsing K10 protocol, our results showed the accuracy in the order of DL > TL > ML, ranging the six accuracies for k-NN, RF, VGG19, IV3, CNN, iCNN as 74.58 ± 2.44%, 96.84 ± 2.6, 94.84 ± 2.85%, 99.53 ± 0.75%, 99.53 ± 1.05%, and 99.69 ± 0.66%, respectively. The corresponding AUCs were 0.74, 0.94, 0.96, 0.99, 0.99, and 0.99 (p-values < 0.0001), respectively. Our Bispectrum-based characterisation system suggested CoP can be separated against NCoP using AI models. COVID risk severity stratification also showed a high correlation of 0.7270 (p < 0.0001) with clinical scores such as ground-glass opacities (GGO), further validating our AI models.

conclusionsWe prove our hypothesis by demonstrating that all the six AI models successfully classified CoP against NCoP due to the strong presence of contrasting features such as ground-glass opacities (GGO), consolidations, and pleural effusion in CoP patients. Further, our online system takes < 2 s for inference.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCOVID-19Deep LearningDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPneumoniaSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAccuracyBispectrumComputer tomographyCOVID-19Deep learningGround-glass opacitiesLungMachine learningPandemicPerformanceTransfer learningValidation

Identifiers

PMID33532975
PMCPMC7854027
OpenAlexW3127602994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.