Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33532893›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2021

Lung Nodule Classification Using Biomarkers, Volumetric Radiomics, and 3D CNNs.

Kushal Mehta, Arshita Jain, Jayalakshmi Mangalagiri, Sumeet Menon, Phuong Nguyen, David R Chapman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. An anthropomorphic diagnosis system of pulmonary nodules using weak annotation-based deep learning.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kushal MehtaUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, MD, USA.
Arshita JainUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, MD, USA.
Jayalakshmi MangalagiriUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, MD, USA.
Sumeet MenonUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, MD, USA.
Phuong NguyenUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, MD, USA.
David R ChapmanUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, MD, USA. dchapm2@umbc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1722-9883
University of Maryland, Baltimore County · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a hybrid algorithm to estimate lung nodule malignancy that combines imaging biomarkers from Radiologist's annotation with image classification of CT scans. Our algorithm employs a 3D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) as well as a Random Forest in order to combine CT imagery with biomarker annotation and volumetric radiomic features. We analyze and compare the performance of the algorithm using only imagery, only biomarkers, combined imagery + biomarkers, combined imagery + volumetric radiomic features, and finally the combination of imagery + biomarkers + volumetric features in order to classify the suspicion level of nodule malignancy. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) IDRI dataset is used to train and evaluate the classification task. We show that the incorporation of semi-supervised learning by means of K-Nearest-Neighbors (KNN) can increase the available training sample size of the LIDC-IDRI, thereby further improving the accuracy of malignancy estimation of most of the models tested although there is no significant improvement with the use of KNN semi-supervised learning if image classification with CNNs and volumetric features is combined with descriptive biomarkers. Unexpectedly, we also show that a model using image biomarkers alone is more accurate than one that combines biomarkers with volumetric radiomics, 3D CNNs, and semi-supervised learning. We discuss the possibility that this result may be influenced by cognitive bias in LIDC-IDRI because malignancy estimates were recorded by the same radiologist panel as biomarkers, as well as future work to incorporate pathology information over a subset of study participants.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsSolitary Pulmonary NoduleBiomarkersHumansLungNeural Networks, ComputerRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiomarkersBenignBiomarkersCNNsLIDCLung cancerMalignancyRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID33532893
PMCPMC8329152
OpenAlexW3094415973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.