Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33532727›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2021

Prediction of Late-Onset Sepsis in Preterm Infants Using Monitoring Signals and Machine Learning.

Laura Cabrera-Quiros, Deedee Kommers, Maria K Wolvers, Laurien Oosterwijk, Niek Arents, Jacqueline van der Sluijs-Bens, Eduardus J E Cottaar, Peter Andriessen, Carola van Pul

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Accurate prediction of neurologic changes in critically ill infants using pose AI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Transforming neonatal care with artificial intelligence: challenges, ethical consideration, and opportunities.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura Cabrera-QuirosDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Deedee KommersDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Maria K WolversDepartment of Pediatrics, Máxima Medical Centre (MMC), Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Laurien OosterwijkDepartment of Pediatrics, Máxima Medical Centre (MMC), Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Niek ArentsFoundation Laboratory for Pathology and Medical Microbiology (PAMM), Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline van der Sluijs-BensDepartment of Pediatrics, Máxima Medical Centre (MMC), Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Eduardus J E CottaarDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Peter AndriessenDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Carola van PulDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Eindhoven University of Technology · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrediction of late-onset sepsis (onset beyond day 3 of life) in preterm infants, based on multiple patient monitoring signals 24 hours before onset.

designContinuous high-resolution electrocardiogram and respiration (chest impedance) data from the monitoring signals were extracted and used to create time-interval features representing heart rate variability, respiration, and body motion. For each infant with a blood culture-proven late-onset sepsis, a Cultures, Resuscitation, and Antibiotics Started Here moment was defined. The Cultures, Resuscitation, and Antibiotics Started Here moment served as an anchor point for the prediction analysis. In the group with controls (C), an "equivalent crash moment" was calculated as anchor point, based on comparable gestational and postnatal age. Three common machine learning approaches (logistic regressor, naive Bayes, and nearest mean classifier) were used to binary classify samples of late-onset sepsis from C. For training and evaluation of the three classifiers, a leave-k-subjects-out cross-validation was used.

settingLevel III neonatal ICU. PATIENTS: The patient population consisted of 32 premature infants with sepsis and 32 age-matched control patients.

interventionsNo interventions were performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsFor the interval features representing heart rate variability, respiration, and body motion, differences between late-onset sepsis and C were visible up to 5 hours preceding the Cultures, Resuscitation, and Antibiotics Started Here moment. Using a combination of all features, classification of late-onset sepsis and C showed a mean accuracy of 0.79 ± 0.12 and mean precision rate of 0.82 ± 0.18 3 hours before the onset of sepsis.

conclusionsInformation from routine patient monitoring can be used to predict sepsis. Specifically, this study shows that a combination of electrocardiogram-based, respiration-based, and motion-based features enables the prediction of late-onset sepsis hours before the clinical crash moment.

Indexed as

infantintensive care unitsmachine learningmonitoringneonatalphysiologicpredictive value of testsprematuresepsis

Identifiers

PMID33532727
PMCPMC7846455
OpenAlexW3125024173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.