Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33532724›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2021

Understanding the sensory and physicochemical differences between commercially produced non-alcoholic lagers, and their influence on consumer liking.

Imogen Ramsey, Qian Yang, Ian Fisk, Rebecca Ford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Imogen RamseySensory Science Centre, Division of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, United Kingdom.
Qian YangSensory Science Centre, Division of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, United Kingdom.
Ian FiskSamworth Flavour Laboratory, Division of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, United Kingdom.
Rebecca FordSensory Science Centre, Division of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the sensory and physicochemical differences of a range of commercial non-alcoholic lagers, as well as their influence on overall liking. Using physicochemical analysis and modified quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) with a trained panel (n = 10) eighteen commercial non-alcoholic lagers, made using different production methods, were assessed. A subset (eleven), representing the sensory space were also assessed for hedonic liking using consumers (n = 104). Overall, it showed a clear variety of non-alcoholic lagers were selected, with different clusters of samples found with identifiable characteristics. Production methods were explored as a possible explanation for the differences in characteristics, however these did not fully explain the clusters and therefore other factors, such as pre or post processing methods are discussed. In terms of overall liking, five clusters of consumers were discovered with different patterns of liking, confirming that a wide range of non-alcoholic lagers are needed to satisfy all consumers.

Indexed as

BeerConsumerNon-volatilesPhysicochemicalSensoryVolatiles

Identifiers

PMID33532724
PMCPMC7822955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.