ReviewJACC. Basic to translational science2021
Bias in Medicine: Lessons Learned and Mitigation Strategies.
Review in JACC. Basic to translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- "We're All in This Together": A Mixed-Methods Study of Provider and Patient Perceptions of Emergency Care for Opioid Use Disorder.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Observational
- Determinants of Trust and Reliance on Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Settings: A Study on Physicians' Use of Large Language Model in Psychiatric Symptom Assessment.Psychiatry investigation · 2026Article
- Article
- Crowdsourcing care: What general practitioner WhatsApp groups get right … and wrong.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2026Article
- Cognitive bias and clinical acumen in uveitis practice.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- AgentClinic: a multimodal benchmark for tool-using clinical AI agents.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Analysis of Patient Safety Event Report to Understand the Contribution of Health IT to Diagnostic Error.Journal of patient safety · 2026Article
- Teaching common cognitive biases and associated errors in veterinary neurologic diagnosis using clinical vignettes: a narrative review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Organizational Psychology Theories in Graduate Medical Education: A Narrative Review.HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2026Review
- Serendipity in Emergency Diagnostics: Near Miss of aClinical case reports · 2025Article
- Biases in Race and Ethnicity Introduced by Filtering Electronic Health Records for "Complete Data": Observational Clinical Data Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Bias in artificial intelligence for medical imaging: fundamentals, detection, avoidance, mitigation, challenges, ethics, and prospects.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Review
- Large language model enhanced framework for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.BMJ digital health & AI · 2025Article
- Evaluation and mitigation of cognitive biases in medical language models.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Investigation of research quality and transparency in neurosurgery through the utilization of open science practices.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- When Healthcare Professionals Disagree: Finding the Right Balance.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2024Article
- Distant Multilevel Spinal Metastasis Secondary to Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cureus · 2024Article
- Delayed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis diagnosis with subtle cardiac manifestations: Was anchoring bias contributory?Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- Machine Learning and Bias in Medical Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2024Review
- Implementation of a novel peer review academy by Surgery and the Association of Women Surgeons.Surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive bias consists of systematic errors in thinking due to human processing limitations or inappropriate mental models. Cognitive bias occurs when intuitive thinking is used to reach conclusions about information rather than analytic (mindful) thinking. Scientific progress is delayed when bias influences the dissemination of new scientific knowledge, as it has with the role of human leucocyte antigen antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection in cardiac transplantation. Mitigating strategies can be successful but involve concerted action by investigators, peer reviewers, and editors to consider how we think as well as what we think.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.