Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33532630›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2021

Evaluation of daily online contour adaptation by radiation therapists for prostate cancer treatment on an MRI-guided linear accelerator.

Thomas Willigenburg, Daan M de Muinck Keizer, Max Peters, An Claes, Jan J W Lagendijk, Hans C J de Boer, Jochem R N van der Voort van Zyp

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07043543 (Randomized Open Phase II Multienter Study Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Online Adaptive Radiotherapy in Bladder Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07043543 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Open Phase II Multienter Study Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Online Adaptive Radiotherapy in Bladder Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2026 to 2033Enrolled120ConditionsBladder CancerArmsAdaptive radiotherapy, standard radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Value of Radiation Therapists in Online Adaptive Radiotherapy.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Training for tomorrow: Establishing a worldwide curriculum in online adaptive radiation therapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas WilligenburgDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Daan M de Muinck KeizerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Max PetersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
An ClaesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jan J W LagendijkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hans C J de BoerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jochem R N van der Voort van ZypDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMagnetic resonance (MR)-guided linear accelerator (MR-Linac) systems have changed radiotherapy workflows. The addition of daily online contour adaptation allows for higher precision treatment, but also increases the workload of those involved. We train radiation therapists (RTTs) to perform daily online contour adaptation for MR-Linac treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate these prostate contours by performing an interfraction and interobserver analysis. MATERIALS AND

methodsClinical target volume (CTV) contours generated online by RTTs from 30 low-intermediate risk PCa patients, treated with 5x7.25 Gy, were used. Two physicians (Observers) judged the RTTs contours and performed adaptations when necessary. Interfraction relative volume differences between the first and the subsequent fractions were calculated for the RTTs, Observer 1, and Observer 2. Additionally, interobserver dice's similarity coefficient (DSC) for fraction 2-5 was calculated with the RTTs- and physician-adapted contours. Clinical acceptability of the RTTs contours was judged by a third observer.

resultsMean (SD) online contour adaptation time was 12.6 (±3.8) minutes and overall median (interquartile range [IQR]) relative volume difference was 9.3% (4.4-13.0). Adaptations by the observers were mostly performed at the apex and base of the prostate. Median (IQR) interobserver DSC between RTTs and Observer 1, RTTs and Observer 2, and Observer 1 and 2 was 0.99 (0.98-1.00), 1.00 (0.98-1.00), and 1.00 (0.99-1.00), respectively. Contours were acceptable for clinical use in 113 (94.2%) fractions. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis showed significant CTV underdosage for one of the seven identified outliers.

conclusionDaily online contour adaptation by RTTs is clinically feasible for MR-Linac treatment of PCa.

Indexed as

Adapt-to-shapeMRI-guided radiotherapyMR-LinacOnline contour adaptationProstate cancerRadiation therapists

Identifiers

PMID33532630
PMCPMC7822780
OpenAlexW3123353923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.