Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33532581›Full record

ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2021

Personalized-induced neural stem cell therapy: Generation, transplant, and safety in a large animal model.

Hunter N Bomba, Kevin T Sheets, Alain Valdivia, Simon Khagi, Laura Ruterbories, Christopher L Mariani, Luke B Borst, Debra A Tokarz, Shawn D Hingtgen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hunter N BombaDivision of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5621-9306
Kevin T SheetsDivision of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA.
Alain ValdiviaDivision of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA.
Simon KhagiDepartment of Neurosurgery The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA.
Laura RuterboriesDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA.
Christopher L MarianiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA.
Luke B BorstDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA.
Debra A TokarzDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA.
Shawn D HingtgenDivision of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

Nanofiber matrices to improve neural stem cell-mediated cancer therapyR01NS097507 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HINGTGEN, SHAWN · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we take an important step toward clinical translation by generating the first canine-induced neural stem cells (iNSCs). We explore key aspects of scale-up, persistence, and safety of personalized iNSC therapy in autologous canine surgery models. iNSCs are a promising new approach to treat aggressive cancers of the brain, including the deadly glioblastoma. Created by direct transdifferentiation of fibroblasts, iNSCs are known to migrate through the brain, track down invasive cancer foci, and deliver anticancer payloads that significantly reduce tumor burden and extend survival of tumor-bearing mice. Here, skin biopsies were collected from canines and converted into the first personalized canine iNSCs engineered to carry TNFα-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and thymidine kinase (TK), as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents for in vivo tracking. Time-lapse analysis showed canine iNSCs efficiently migrate to human tumor cells, and cell viability assays showed both TRAIL and TK monotherapy markedly reduced tumor growth. Using intraoperative navigation and two delivery methods to closely mimic human therapy, canines received autologous iNSCs either within postsurgical cavities in a biocompatible matrix or via a catheter placed in the lateral ventricle. Both strategies were well tolerated, and serial MRI showed hypointense regions at the implant sites that remained stable through 86 days postimplant. Serial fluid sample testing following iNSC delivery showed the bimodal personalized therapy was well tolerated, with no iNSC-induced abnormal tissue pathology. Overall, this study lays an important foundation as this promising personalized cell therapy advances toward human patient testing.

Indexed as

glioblastomaneural stem cellsstem cell delivery

Identifiers

PMID33532581
PMCPMC7823134
OpenAlexW3039892126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.