Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33532476›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2021

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the UK: analysis of the British Thoracic Society electronic registry between 2013 and 2019.

Lisa G Spencer, Maria Loughenbury, Nazia Chaudhuri, Monica Spiteri, Helen Parfrey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetics of chronic respiratory disease.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa G SpencerAintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3558-992X
Maria LoughenburyBritish Thoracic Society, London, UK.
Nazia ChaudhuriWythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Monica SpiteriUniversity Hospital of North Midlands, Stoke on Trent, UK.
Helen ParfreyRoyal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4515-5634
British Thoracic Society · GBPapworth Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBWythenshawe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive and terminal interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a median survival of 3-5 years. The British Thoracic Society (BTS) established the UK IPF Registry in 2013 as a platform to collect data on clinical characteristics, treatments and outcomes for this cohort in the UK. Between 1 January 2013 and 31 October 2019, 2474 cases were registered. Most patients were male (79%) with a mean±sd age of 74±8.3 years and 66% were ex-smokers. Over time we observed an increase in the number of patients aged over 70 years. However, we have not seen a trend towards earlier presentation as symptoms of breathless and/or cough were present for >12 months in 63% of the cohort. At presentation, mean±sd % predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) was 78.2±18.3%, median 76.2% (interquartile range (IQR) 22.4%) and transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide (

Identifiers

PMID33532476
PMCPMC7836645
OpenAlexW3092336470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.