Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33532423›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2020

Quality of life in medical students with internet addiction.

Najah Muhammad Almukhtar, Saad M Alsaad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Najah Muhammad AlmukhtarDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saad M AlsaadDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud Medical City · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesWidespread use of the internet is a serious concern among university students worldwide. Internet addiction affects the students' physically and psychologically and poses social and environmental challenges to their well-being. This study was used to assess the levels of internet addiction among medical students at a major university in Saudi Arabia and to measure the quality of life among these students. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was used to gain responses from 437 students using questionnaire surveys. These questionnaires were based on the World Health Organization's standard quality of life survey questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF).

resultsAnalysis of the results displayed that the students were only moderately addicted to the internet. Moreover, with respect to the quality of life, these students scored high in physical, social, psychological, and environmental sub-domains of the quality of life questionnaire survey.

conclusionsThese results provide evidence that, in contrast to findings in some other countries, medical students in Saudi Arabia enjoy a better quality of life with moderate internet addiction levels. Future studies can broaden the scope of the survey methodology used in this paper to cover medical students in other universities in Saudi Arabia. Moreover, correlations with exam scores can be established using case-control studies for a more thorough analysis. Therefore, this study provides a significant positive step in the direction of further research in this field.

Indexed as

Internet addictionmedical studentsquality of lifeSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID33532423
PMCPMC7842437
OpenAlexW3109743362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.