Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33532328›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2021

Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes for testicular choriocarcinoma: a population-based study.

Huihuang Li, Zhiyong Cai, Renyu Liu, Jiao Hu, Jinbo Chen, Xiongbing Zu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Huihuang LiDepartment of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zhiyong CaiDepartment of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Renyu LiuDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jiao HuDepartment of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jinbo ChenDepartment of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiongbing ZuDepartment of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the scarcity of cases of testicular choriocarcinoma (CC), its clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis have not been well summarized. Consequently, we conducted this population-based case-control study to characterize the features of testicular CC.

methodsThe SEER database was used to extract qualified data. Dichotomous variables were compared by Pearson's Chi-squared or Fisher exact test. Survival variables were compared by Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests. The univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were applied to figure out risk factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control confounding factors in the study.

resultsIn total, 788 patients with CC and 19,571 patients with seminoma were identified. Significant differences were found between two groups in terms of age (≤30 years: 65.4%

conclusionsChoriocarcinoma is exceedingly rare disease with metastases at initial diagnose and has poor survival even after treatment. Old age and advanced tumor stage indicate a poor prognosis, while surgery therapy can improve prognosis. Nevertheless, longer-term studies with larger population of patients are needed to verify their biological behavior and therapeutic efficacy.

Indexed as

clinicopathological characteristicsnon-seminomasurvival timeTesticular choriocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33532328
PMCPMC7844494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.