ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021
Respiratory deformation registration in 4D-CT/cone beam CT using deep learning.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- An end-to-end neural network for 4D cardiac CT reconstruction using single-beat scans.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in four-dimensional imaging for motion management in radiation therapy.Artificial intelligence review · 2025Article
- Fast motion-compensated reconstruction for 4D-CBCT using deep learning-based groupwise registration.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2024Article
- SPW-TransUNet: three-dimensional computed tomography-cone beam computed tomography image registration with spatial perpendicular window Transformer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- An overview of artificial intelligence in medical physics and radiation oncology.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2023Review
- Evaluation of a respiratory motion-corrected image reconstruction algorithm in 2-[Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Unsupervised computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography image registration using a dual attention network.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- A review of deep learning-based deformable medical image registration.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- A review of deep learning-based three-dimensional medical image registration methods.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Review
- A Feasibility Study of Hybrid Deep-Learning Prediction with Online Adaptation of Breathing Irregularities for Long-Term Internal Organ Motion During Radiotherapy.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the feasibility of using a supervised convolutional neural network (CNN) to register phase-to-phase deformable vector field of lung 4D-CT/4D-cone beam CT for 4D dose accumulation, contour propagation, motion modeling, or target verification.
methodsWe built a CNN-based deep learning method to register the deformation field directly between phases of patients' 4D-CT or 4D-cone beam CT. The input consists of patch pairs of two phases, while the output is the corresponding deformation field that registers the patch pairs. The centers of the patch pairs were uniformly sampled across the lung, and the size of the patches was chosen to cover the range of the respiratory motion. The network was trained to generate deformation field that matches with the reference deformation field generated by VelocityAI (Varian). The network is structured with four convolutional layers, two average pooling layers, and two fully connected layers. Half mean squared error is applied to guide the study as loss function. Nine patients with eleven sets of 4D-CT/cone beam CT image volumes were used for training and testing. The performance of the network was validated with intra-patient and inter-patient setups.
resultsRegistered images were generated with Velocity deformation field and the CNN deformation field, respectively. Main anatomic features such as the main vessels and the diaphragm matched well between two deformed images. In the diaphragm region, the coefficients of cross-correlation, root mean squared error, and structural similarity index measure (SSIM) between deformed images registered by CNN and VelocityAI was calculated. The cross-correlation was above 0.9 for all the intra-patient cases.
conclusionsPatch-based deep learning methods achieved comparable deformable registration accuracy as VelocityAI. Compared to VelocityAI, the deep learning method is fully automatic and faster without user dependency, which makes it more preferable in clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.