ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021
Prediction of suspicious ankle instability using the calcaneofibular ligament cross-sectional area.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Value of Calcaneofibular Ligament Tortuosity on Oblique Coronal MRI in Chronic Ankle Instability.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of chronic ankle instability and subtalar instability using the angle between the anterior talofibular ligament and calcaneofibular ligament.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn injured calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) is a major cause of ankle instability (AI). Previous research has demonstrated that the thickness of the calcaneofibular ligament (CFLT) is correlated with higher-grade sprains and ankle instability. However, inflammatory hypertrophy is distinct from ligament thickness; accordingly, we considered that the calcaneofibular ligament cross-sectional area (CFLCSA) as a potential morphological parameter to analyze inflammatory CFL. We hypothesized that the CFLCSA was a key morphologic parameter in AI diagnosis.
methodsWe gathered the CFL data of 26 AI patients and 25 control subjects who had undergone ankle magnetic resonance imaging (A-MRI), and it had revealed no evidence of AI. Ankle level T1-weighted coronal A-MRI images were acquired. Using our image analysis program (INFINITT PACS), we analyzed the CFLT and CFLCSA at the CFL on the A-MRI. The CFLCSA was measured as the whole ligament cross-sectional area of the CFL that was most hypertrophied in the transverse A-MR images. The CFLT was measured at the thickest level of CFL.
resultsThe mean CFLT was 3.49±0.82 mm in the control group, and 4.82±0.76 mm in the AI group. The mean CFLCSA was 33.31±7.02 mm
conclusionsEven though the CFLT and CFLCSA were both significantly associated with AI, the CFLCSA was a more sensitive diagnostic test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.