Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33532213›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy techniques2021

Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Technique With an Iliotibial Band Strand Without Implants.

Sebastian Abusleme, Lars Strömbäck, Gaston Caracciolo, Hector Zamorano, Jorge Cheyre, Francisco Vergara, Roberto Yañez

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy techniques, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05923710 (Comparison of Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With and Without Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis for Proximal ACL Tears), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05923710 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With and Without Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis for Proximal ACL Tears: A Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorProf. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital OrganizationRan2020 to 2023Enrolled38ConditionsAnterior Cruciate Ligament TearArmsPrimary anterior cruciate ligament repair, Primary anterior cruciate ligament repair and lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) with iliotibial band
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian AbuslemeClínica MEDS, Santiago de Chile.
Lars StrömbäckClínica MEDS, Santiago de Chile.
Gaston CaraccioloClínica MEDS, Santiago de Chile.
Hector ZamoranoClínica MEDS, Santiago de Chile.
Jorge CheyreClínica MEDS, Santiago de Chile.
Francisco VergaraClínica MEDS, Santiago de Chile.
Roberto YañezClínica MEDS, Santiago de Chile.
Clínica MEDS (Chile) · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main goal in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) should be to restore normal knee biomechanics so the chances of failure decrease. The persistence of knee instability after ACLR goes from 0.7% to 20%. Several factors have been identified and studied, but there are some selected cases in which it seems that without adding lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) it is not possible to control rotational instability. Data exist supporting that LET could reduce pivot shift (PS), without losing flexion/extension range of motion nor adding risk of osteoarthritis. Recently, LET has been used in addition to ACLR to add restriction to internal tibial rotation forces, and different authors have shown their techniques to achieve this task. Also, biomechanical studies have compared different techniques for LET procedures. This article aims to describe our technique performing a modified Macintosh LET as an addition to ACLR in selected patients who require extra internal tibial rotation control. This is a reproducible, easy to learn, and inexpensive procedure in terms that only a high resistance suture is needed and not any other implant, such as a stapler, anchors, or screws, reducing the risk of tunnel coalition.

Identifiers

PMID33532213
PMCPMC7823113
OpenAlexW3123511638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.