Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3353219›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research1988

BIGPROBE: a computer program that predicts the sequence of long oligonucleotide probes with high reliability.

M Dubnick, L K Lewis, D W Mount

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 1988. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M DubnickDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721.
L K Lewis
D W Mount

Funding

MECHANISM OF INDUCTION OF VIRAL AND CELLULAR FUNCTIONSR01GM024496 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI MOUNT, DAVID W · 1985 to 1993
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM24496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have written a computer program, BIGPROBE, which facilitates the design of long nucleic acid probes from the partial or complete amino acid sequence of a protein. BIGPROBE relies upon information on codon usage, intercodon dinucleotide frequency, and potential probe self-complementarity. We have examined the accuracy with which the program predicts coding sequences using sample human and rat genes and probe lengths of 30-60 nucleotides. Rat probe sequences selected by BIGPROBE using either codon usage or dinucleotide frequency data alone averaged 86-92% homology with the known exons of the corresponding gene sequences. Predictive accuracy with rat gene probes could be improved to 89-94%, depending upon probe length, by applying codon usage and dinucleotide frequency data in combination. Similar accuracy was achieved for human genes.

Indexed as

Base SequenceComputersMicrocomputersAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCodonHumansNucleotide MappingOligonucleotidesRatsSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidSoftwareCodonOligonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID3353219
PMCPMC338165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.