ArticleCureus2020
Renal Auto-Transplantation for Loin Pain Hematuria Syndrome Using a Multidisciplinary Team Model: Intermediate-Term Results.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Kidney Autotransplantation: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Loin pain haematuria syndrome 1967-2020: a review.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Review
- Therapeutic Donor Kidney Transplant Outcomes: Comparing Early US Experiences Using Optimal Matching.Transplantation direct · 2023Article
- Autotransplantation as a feasible intervention for combined nutcracker syndrome and Loin Pain Hematuria Syndrome.Urology case reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background Patients with loin pain hematuria syndrome (LPHS) can find relief via multiple modalities, few provide long-term pain control like renal auto-transplantation (RAT). This study evaluates the intermediate effectiveness of the RAT procedure's ability to achieve long-term pain control and quality of life improvement. Methods All patients with suspected LPHS were seen by a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) composed of urologists, interventional radiologists, and transplant surgeons. Clinical history and physical exam, lab values, imaging findings, and response to renal hilar block (RHB) were used to determine LPHS and candidacy for potential RAT. Preoperative, one-year, three-year, and five-year postoperative pain assessment scores and quality of life surveys were administered to each LPHS and potential RAT patient. Results Eighty-four LPHS patients were referred for the evaluation of and consultation for the option of RAT. Sixty-four of these patients underwent RHB of which 60 (93.8%) had a positive response, defined as a temporary reduction of pain score by >50%. Forty-six of the 60 patients who responded favorably proceeded to RAT. At the one-year follow-up, there was a 75% reduction in pain with 88.9% of patients experiencing a 50% reduction in pain. At one year, the mean Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) decreased by 65.4%, from an average of 23.7 to 8.2. Similarly, at three years (n = 5) and five years (n = 3), the mean pain scores were 2 and 1. Conclusions The MDT evaluation of potential LPHS patients with our protocol and treatment results in an improvement in pain and depression scores in these selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.