ArticleCureus2020
Role of Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow for Measuring the Effectiveness of Surgery in Children with Adenoidal Hypertrophy.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of numerical simulation of upper airway flow field in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea with adenoid hypertrophy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Nasal airway obstruction in children is a frequent problem in otolaryngology practice. Adenoidal hypertrophy (AH) is the most common pathology in childhood that requires surgery. Nasal patency can be evaluated by subjective and objective methods. Unlike other methods, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) is portable and easy to perform. The need for patient compliance is the most important disadvantage of this method. We aimed to analyze the significance of PNIF for measuring the effectiveness of adenoidectomy as well as to compare PNIF with other subjective methods. Methods Two-hundred forty-five (245) patients aged between six and 11 years were evaluated. Seventy-seven (77) of them formed the study group and 168 formed the control group. Pre and post-surgery PNIF measurements, adenoid scores, and simple visual analog scale (sVAS) were recorded. Results The average PNIF value has significantly increased to 70.65 L/min from 33.02 L/min after adenoidectomy (p<0.01). The average PNIF value was 71.66 L/min in control subjects. High PNIF values were significantly correlated with low sVAS and adenoid scores postoperatively in the study group as compared with those of preoperative data (p<0.01). Conclusions PNIF has a satisfying correlation with nasal examination findings and other subjective methods to evaluate nasal obstruction and may provide unique and complementary information helpful for evaluating and improving the effects of adenoidectomy in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.