ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2021
Evaluating the Mechanism by Which the TNO Stereo Test Overestimates Stereo Thresholds.
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Eye Movement Monitoring Tool: Towards a Non-Invasive Device for Amblyopia Treatment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Depth Perception and Intraocular Differences in Visual Acuities Among Older Spectacle Wearers.Materia socio-medica · 2025Article
- Factors Affecting Outcomes of Stereoacuity in Partially Refractive Accommodative Esotropia with Motor Success Treated by Preoperative Prism Correction and Surgery.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Comparison of stereopsis thresholds measured with conventional methods and a new eye tracking method.PloS one · 2023Article
- Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology.Journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several studies have revealed that results of the TNO stereo test may overestimate the stereoacuity value (the less the better) compared with other testing measurements. The manner in which vision is divided among two eyes of a person wearing anaglyph glasses may play an important role. This study aimed to examine the effect of anaglyph glasses on stereopsis measurements. A stereopsis measurement system using a phoropter and two Sony smartphones was established. Four types of test patterns, including the original TNO stereo test pictures, isoluminant red-green pictures, grayscale pictures, and black and white dots pictures, were designed. A total of 32 participants were recruited for this study. A significant difference was found among the four groups (Friedman test, chi-square = 50.985,
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.