Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33531601›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Choosing source of microorganisms and processing technology for next generation beet bioinoculant.

Sonia Szymańska, Marcin Sikora, Katarzyna Hrynkiewicz, Jarosław Tyburski, Andrzej Tretyn, Marcin Gołębiewski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonia SzymańskaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University (NCU), Lwowska 1, 87-100, Toruń, Poland.
Marcin SikoraCenter for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University (NCU), Toruń, Poland.
Katarzyna HrynkiewiczDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University (NCU), Lwowska 1, 87-100, Toruń, Poland. hrynk@umk.pl.
Jarosław TyburskiCenter for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University (NCU), Toruń, Poland.
Andrzej TretynCenter for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University (NCU), Toruń, Poland.
Marcin GołębiewskiCenter for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University (NCU), Toruń, Poland. mgoleb@umk.pl.
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increase of human population and associated increasing demand for agricultural products lead to soil over-exploitation. Biofertilizers based on lyophilized plant material containing living plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPM) could be an alternative to conventional fertilizers that fits into sustainable agricultural technologies ideas. We aimed to: (1) assess the diversity of endophytic bacteria in sugar and sea beet roots and (2) determine the influence of osmoprotectants (trehalose and ectoine) addition during lyophilization on bacterial density, viability and salt tolerance. Microbiome diversity was assessed based on 16S rRNA amplicons sequencing, bacterial density and salt tolerance was evaluated in cultures, while bacterial viability was calculated by using fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Here we show that plant genotype shapes its endophytic microbiome diversity and determines rhizosphere soil properties. Sea beet endophytic microbiome, consisting of genera characteristic for extreme environments, is more diverse and salt resistant than its crop relative. Supplementing osmoprotectants during root tissue lyophilization exerts a positive effect on bacterial community salt stress tolerance, viability and density. Trehalose improves the above-mentioned parameters more effectively than ectoine, moreover its use is economically advantageous, thus it may be used to formulate improved biofertilizers.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyBeta vulgarisCrop ProductionDNA, BacterialEndophytesFreeze DryingHumansMicrobiotaRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSalt ToleranceSustainable DevelopmentDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID33531601
PMCPMC7854725
OpenAlexW3128963177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.