ArticleScientific reports2021
Micro computed tomography with and without contrast enhancement for the characterization of microcarriers in dry and wet state.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Micro computed tomography with and without contrast enhancement for the characterization of microcarriers in dry and wet state.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Microcarrier Screening and Evaluation for Dynamic Expansion of Human Periosteum-Derived Progenitor Cells in a Xenogeneic Free Medium.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the field of regenerative medicine, microcarriers are used as support matrix for the growth of adherent cells. They are increasingly recognised as promising biomaterials for large scale, cost-effective cell expansion bioreactor processes. However, their individual morphologies can be highly heterogeneous which increases bioprocesses' variability. Additionally, only limited information is available on the microcarriers' 3D morphology and how it affects cell proliferation. Most imaging modalities do not provide sufficient 3D information or have a too limited field of view to appropriately study the 3D morphology. While microfocus X-ray computed tomography (microCT) could be appropriate, many microcarriers are hydrated before in-vitro use. This wet state makes them swell, changing considerably their morphology and making them indistinguishable from the culture solution in regular microCT images due to their physical density close to water. The use of contrast-enhanced microCT (CE-CT) has been recently reported for 3D imaging of soft materials. In this study, we selected a range of commercially available microcarrier types and used a combination of microCT and CE-CT for full 3D morphological characterization of large numbers of microcarriers, both in their dry and wet state. With in-house developed image processing and analysis tools, morphometrics of individual microcarriers were collected. Also, the morphology in wet state was assessed and related to accessible attachment surface area as a function of cell size. The morphological information on all microcarriers was collected in a publicly available database. This work provides a quantitative basis for optimization and modelling of microcarrier based cell expansion processes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.