ArticleDiabetes care2021
Quantifying Variation in Treatment Utilization for Type 2 Diabetes Across Five Major University of California Health Systems.
Article in Diabetes care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Large Language Models for Enhancing Diabetologist-Developed Personalized Treatment Plans in Complex Type 2 Diabetes.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025Article
- Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Emergency Department Visits for Opioid Use Disorder Across University of California Health Centers.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Performance of Primary Care Physicians in the Management of Glycemia, Lipids, and Blood Pressure among People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Predicting post-liver transplant outcomes in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure using Expert-Augmented Machine Learning.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2023Article
- Second-Line Pharmaceutical Treatments for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Translational Bioinformatics to Enable Precision Medicine for All: Elevating Equity across Molecular, Clinical, and Digital Realms.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2022Review
- "Beyond MELD" - Emerging strategies and technologies for improving mortality prediction, organ allocation and outcomes in liver transplantation.Journal of hepatology · 2022Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveUsing the newly created University of California (UC) Health Data Warehouse, we present the first study to analyze antihyperglycemic treatment utilization across the five large UC academic health systems (Davis, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Francisco). RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThis retrospective analysis used deidentified electronic health records (EHRs; 2014-2019) including 97,231 patients with type 2 diabetes from 1,003 UC-affiliated clinical settings. Significant differences between health systems and individual providers were identified using binomial probabilities with cohort matching.
resultsOur analysis reveals statistically different treatment utilization patterns not only between health systems but also among individual providers within health systems. We identified 21 differences among health systems and 29 differences among individual providers within these health systems, with respect to treatment intensifications within existing guidelines on top of either metformin monotherapy or dual therapy with metformin and a sulfonylurea. Next, we identified variation for medications within the same class (e.g., glipizide vs. glyburide among sulfonylureas), with 33 differences among health systems and 86 among individual providers. Finally, we identified 2 health systems and 55 individual providers who more frequently used medications with known cardioprotective benefits for patients with high cardiovascular disease risk, but also 1 health system and 8 providers who prescribed such medications less frequently for these patients.
conclusionsOur study used cohort-matching techniques to highlight real-world variation in care between health systems and individual providers. This demonstrates the power of EHRs to quantify differences in treatment utilization, a necessary step toward standardizing precision care for large populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.