Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33531376›Full record

ArticleHospital pediatrics2021

Disparity in Nurse Discharge Communication for Hospitalized Families Based on English Proficiency.

Angela Y Choe, Joanna E Thomson, Ndidi I Unaka, Vanessa Wagner, Michelle Durling, Dianna Moeller, Emelia Ampomah, Colleen Mangeot, Amanda C Schondelmeyer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hospital pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Angela Y ChoeDivision of Hospital Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; anchoe@chla.usc.edu.
Joanna E ThomsonDivision of Hospital Medicine and.
Ndidi I UnakaDivision of Hospital Medicine and.
Vanessa WagnerCollege of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Michelle DurlingDivision of Hospital Medicine and.
Dianna MoellerDivision of Hospital Medicine and.
Emelia AmpomahDivision of Hospital Medicine and.
Colleen MangeotDivision of Epidemiology, Departments of Environmental and Public Health Sciences and.
Amanda C SchondelmeyerDivision of Hospital Medicine and.
Pediatrics and Genetics · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E., KISSELA, BRETT M · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
Cincinnati Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences and TrainingUL1TR000077 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E., TSEVAT, JOEL · 2012 to 2014
$9.9M
The Patient and Parent Perspective on Alarm Use (PAUSE) StudyK08HS026763 · AHRQ · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI SCHONDELMEYER, AMANDA · 2019 to 2023
$750k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS026763NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000077NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEffective communication is critical for safely discharging hospitalized children, including those with limited English proficiency (LEP), who are at high risk of reuse. Our objective was to describe and compare the safety and family centeredness of nurse communication at hospital discharge for English-proficient (EP) and LEP families.

methodsIn this single-center, cross-sectional study, we used direct observation of hospital discharges for EP and LEP children. Observers recorded quantitative and qualitative details of nurse-family communication, focusing on 3 domains: safe discharge, family centeredness, and family engagement. Patient characteristics and percentages of encounters in which all components were discussed within each domain were compared between EP and LEP encounters by using Fisher's exact tests. We used field notes to supplement quantitative findings.

resultsWe observed 140 discharge encounters; 49% were with LEP families. Nurses discussed all safe discharge components in 31% of all encounters, most frequently omitting emergency department return precautions. Nurses used all family-centered communication components in 11% and family-engagement components in 89% of all encounters. Nurses were more likely to discuss all components of safe discharge in EP encounters when compared with LEP encounters (53% vs 9%;

conclusionsDischarge encounters of LEP patients were less likely to include all safe discharge communication components, compared with EP encounters. Opportunities to improve nurse-family discharge communication include providing written discharge instructions in families' primary language, ensuring discussion of return precautions, and using teach-back to optimize family engagement and understanding.

Indexed as

LanguagePatient DischargeChildCommunicationCommunication BarriersCross-Sectional StudiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID33531376
PMCPMC7898234
OpenAlexW3127915111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.