Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33531134›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2021

Evaluation of the Oncomine Pan-Cancer Cell-Free Assay for Analyzing Circulating Tumor DNA in the Cerebrospinal Fluid in Patients with Central Nervous System Malignancies.

Mauli Shah, Takeshi Takayasu, Soheil Zorofchian Moghadamtousi, Octavio Arevalo, Melissa Chen, Chieh Lan, Dzifa Duose, Peter Hu, Jay-Jiguang Zhu, Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Circulating tumor DNA profiling for childhood brain tumors: Technical challenges and evidence for utility.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mauli ShahGraduate Program in Diagnostic Genetics, School of Health Professions, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.
Takeshi TakayasuDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.
Soheil Zorofchian MoghadamtousiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.
Octavio ArevaloDepartment of Radiology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.
Melissa ChenDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Chieh LanDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Dzifa DuoseDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Peter HuGraduate Program in Diagnostic Genetics, School of Health Professions, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jay-Jiguang ZhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; Memorial Hermann Hospital, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Sinchita Roy-ChowdhuriDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Roy F RiascosDepartment of Radiology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.
Hui ChenDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Rajyalakshmi LuthraDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Hematopathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Yoshua EsquenaziDepartment of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; Memorial Hermann Hospital, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: yoshua.esquenazilevy@uth.tmc.edu.
Leomar Y BallesterDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; Memorial Hermann Hospital, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: leomar.y.ballester@uth.tmc.edu.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USMemorial Hermann · US

Funding

Development and Validation of a CSF Liquid Biopsy for Molecular Characterization and Monitoring of Patients with Central Nervous System TumorsK08CA241651 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BALLESTER, LEOMAR Y · 2020 to 2024
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA241651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Available tools to evaluate patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumors such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology, and brain biopsies, have significant limitations. MRI and CSF cytology have poor specificity and sensitivity, respectively, and brain biopsies are invasive. Circulating tumor DNA in CSF (CSF-ctDNA) could be used as a biomarker in patients with CNS tumors, but studies in this area are limited. We evaluated four CSF-ctDNA extraction methods and analyzed mutations in CSF-ctDNA with the Oncomine Pan-Cancer cell-free assay. CSF-ctDNA was extracted from 38 patients with primary or metastatic CNS tumors and 10 patients without CNS malignancy. Commercial ctDNA controls were used for assay evaluation. CSF-ctDNA yields ranged from 3.65 to 3120 ng. Mutations were detected in 39.5% of samples. TP53 was the most commonly mutated gene and copy number alterations were detected in CCND1, MYC, and ERBB2/HER2. Twenty-five percent of CSF-cytology-negative samples showed mutations in CSF-ctDNA. There was good concordance between mutations in CSF-ctDNA and matching tumors. The QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit was the optimal method for extraction of CSF-ctDNA and the Oncomine cell-free DNA assay is suitable for detection of mutations in CSF-ctDNA. Analysis of CSF-ctDNA is more sensitive than CSF-cytology and has the potential to improve the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with CNS tumors.

Indexed as

Biological AssayAdultAgedCell-Free SystemCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsCirculating Tumor DNADNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGenome, HumanHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationYoung AdultCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID33531134
PMCPMC7874332
OpenAlexW3127812426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.