Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33531097›Full record

ArticleEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2021

Surveilling COVID-19 Emotional Contagion on Twitter by Sentiment Analysis.

Cristina Crocamo, Marco Viviani, Lorenzo Famiglini, Francesco Bartoli, Gabriella Pasi, Giuseppe Carrà

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Short-Term Consequences of COVID-19 on Mental Health: State of the Art from Available Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Professionals' Digital Training for Child Maltreatment Prevention in the COVID-19 Era: A Pan-European Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Did we learn something positive out of the COVID-19 pandemic? Post-traumatic growth and mental health in the general population.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cristina CrocamoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2979-2107
Marco VivianiDepartment of Informatics, Systems, and Communication, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2274-9050
Lorenzo FamigliniDepartment of Informatics, Systems, and Communication, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Francesco BartoliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Gabriella PasiDepartment of Informatics, Systems, and Communication, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Giuseppe CarràDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6877-6169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe fight against the COVID-19 pandemic seems to encompass a social media debate, possibly resulting in emotional contagion and the need for novel surveillance approaches. In the current study, we aimed to examine the flow and content of tweets, exploring the role of COVID-19 key events on the popular Twitter platform.

methodsUsing representative freely available data, we performed a focused, social media-based analysis to capture COVID-19 discussions on Twitter, considering sentiment and longitudinal trends between January 19 and March 3, 2020. Different populations of users were considered. Core discussions were explored measuring tweets' sentiment, by both computing a polarity compound score with 95% Confidence Interval and using a transformer-based model, pretrained on a large corpus of COVID-19-related Tweets. Context-dependent meaning and emotion-specific features were considered.

resultsWe gathered 3,308,476 tweets written in English. Since the first World Health Organization report (January 21), negative sentiment proportion of tweets gradually increased as expected, with amplifications following key events. Sentiment scores were increasingly negative among most active users. Tweets content and flow revealed an ongoing scenario in which the global emergency seems difficult to be emotionally managed, as shown by sentiment trajectories.

conclusionsIntegrating social media like Twitter as essential surveillance tools in the management of the pandemic and its waves might actually represent a novel preventive approach to hinder emotional contagion, disseminating reliable information and nurturing trust. There is the need to monitor and sustain healthy behaviors as well as community supports also via social media-based preventive interventions.

Indexed as

EmotionsPandemicsCOVID-19Health BehaviorHealth EducationHumansLongitudinal StudiesSARS-CoV-2Social MediaTrustEmotional contagionmental healthsentiment analysessocial media

Identifiers

PMID33531097
PMCPMC7943954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.