Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33531048›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2021

Acoustic and language analysis of speech for suicidal ideation among US veterans.

Anas Belouali, Samir Gupta, Vaibhav Sourirajan, Jiawei Yu, Nathaniel Allen, Adil Alaoui, Mary Ann Dutton, Matthew J Reinhard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anas BeloualiInnovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. ab873@georgetown.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2780-2500
Samir GuptaInnovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Vaibhav SourirajanInnovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Jiawei YuInnovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Nathaniel AllenWar Related Illness and Injury Study Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Adil AlaouiInnovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Mary Ann DuttonDepartment of Psychiatry, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Matthew J ReinhardWar Related Illness and Injury Study Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Georgetown University · USVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

Maternal Morbidity and Mortality: Risk Factors, Early Detection and Personalized InterventionUL1TR001409 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI GONDRE-LEWIS, MARJORIE C, MELLMAN, THOMAS A · 2015 to 2024
$37.8M
CAM in Veterans with Gulf War IllnessesI01CX000801 · VA · U.S. DEPT/VETS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER · PI REINHARD, MATTHEW J. · 2014 to 2019
–
CSRD VA I01 CX000801Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science UL1-TR001409NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001409U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs 5 I01 CX000801 02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening for suicidal ideation in high-risk groups such as U.S. veterans is crucial for early detection and suicide prevention. Currently, screening is based on clinical interviews or self-report measures. Both approaches rely on subjects to disclose their suicidal thoughts. Innovative approaches are necessary to develop objective and clinically applicable assessments. Speech has been investigated as an objective marker to understand various mental states including suicidal ideation. In this work, we developed a machine learning and natural language processing classifier based on speech markers to screen for suicidal ideation in US veterans. METHODOLOGY: Veterans submitted 588 narrative audio recordings via a mobile app in a real-life setting. In addition, participants completed self-report psychiatric scales and questionnaires. Recordings were analyzed to extract voice characteristics including prosodic, phonation, and glottal. The audios were also transcribed to extract textual features for linguistic analysis. We evaluated the acoustic and linguistic features using both statistical significance and ensemble feature selection. We also examined the performance of different machine learning algorithms on multiple combinations of features to classify suicidal and non-suicidal audios.

resultsA combined set of 15 acoustic and linguistic features of speech were identified by the ensemble feature selection. Random Forest classifier, using the selected set of features, correctly identified suicidal ideation in veterans with 86% sensitivity, 70% specificity, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 80%.

conclusionsSpeech analysis of audios collected from veterans in everyday life settings using smartphones offers a promising approach for suicidal ideation detection. A machine learning classifier may eventually help clinicians identify and monitor high-risk veterans.

Identifiers

PMID33531048
PMCPMC7856815
OpenAlexW3126772981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.