ArticleBMC medical ethics2021
Patient privacy and autonomy: a comparative analysis of cases of ethical dilemmas in China and the United States.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient experiences of opposite gender nurse-patient interactions at public health facilities in Namibia.Curationis · 2026Article
- Using the Theoretical Domains Framework to Identify Barriers to and Enablers of Patient Telemedicine Services Use in China: Qualitative Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Life-Sustaining Treatment Communication: A Comparison Between Physicians and Surrogates.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Navigating preferences for a trouble-free transition: a grounded theory study among older residents in nursing homes.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Ethical Challenges in Research Involving Hospitalized Patients: A Phenomenological Study.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025Article
- Navigating the delicate balance of autonomy and harmony: a case study on the cultural adaptation of palliative care interventions in China.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- "I Do Not Believe We Should Disclose Everything to an Older Patient": Challenges and Ethical Concerns in Clinical Decision-Making in Old-Age Care in Ethiopia.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2024Article
- Effective Privacy Protection Strategies for Pregnancy and Gestation Information From Electronic Medical Records: Retrospective Study in a National Health Care Data Network in China.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Practice Standards in International Medical Departments of Public Academic Hospitals in China: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Health professionals' views and experiences of breaking bad news in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- The pregnancy experiences and antenatal care services of Chinese migrants in Switzerland: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Behind open doors: Patient privacy and the impact of design in primary health care, a qualitative study in Indonesia.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Comparative Analysis of Chinese Culture and Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan Culture in the Field of Public Health Based on the CNN Model.Journal of environmental and public health · 2022Article
- Cultural sensitivity in brain death determination: a necessity in end-of-life decisions in Japan.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRespect for patients' autonomy is usually considered to be an important ethical principle in Western countries; privacy is one of the implications of such respect. Healthcare professionals frequently encounter ethical dilemmas during their practice. The past few decades have seen an increased use of courts to resolve intractable ethical dilemmas across both the developed and the developing world. However, Chinese and American bioethics differ largely due to the influence of Chinese Confucianism and Western religions, respectively, and there is a dearth of comparative studies that explore cases of ethical dilemmas between China and the United States.
methodsThis paper discusses four typical cases with significant social impact. First, it compares two cases concerning patient privacy: the "Shihezi University Hospital Case", in which a patient was used as a clinical teaching object without her permission, and the "New York-Presbyterian Hospital Case", in which the hospital allowed the filming of a patient's treatment without his consent. Second, it compares two cases regarding patient autonomy and potentially life-saving medical procedures: the "Case of Ms. L", concerning a cohabitant's refusal to sign a consent form for a pregnant woman's caesarean, and the "Case of Mrs. V", concerning a hospital's insistence upon a blood transfusion for a dissenting patient. This paper introduces the supporting and opposing views for each case and discusses their social impact. It then compares and analyses the differences between China and the United States from cultural and legislative perspectives.
conclusionsEthical dilemmas have often occurred in China due to the late development of bioethics. However, the presence of bioethics earlier in the US than in China has not spared the US of ethical dilemmas. This paper highlights lessons and inspiration from the cases for healthcare professionals and introduces readers to the role and weight of privacy and autonomy in China and in the US from the perspectives of different cultures, religions and laws.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.