Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33530994›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Strategies for spinal surgery reimbursement: bundling in the working-age population.

Michael K Dalton, Christer Mjåset, Adoma Manful, Melvin D Helgeson, William Wynn-Jones, Zara Cooper, Tracey P Koehlmoos, Joel S Weissman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael K DaltonCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, 1 Brigham Circle, Boston, MA, 02120, USA. mdalton9@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4526-3253
Christer MjåsetDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Adoma ManfulCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, 1 Brigham Circle, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
Melvin D HelgesonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
William Wynn-JonesCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, 1 Brigham Circle, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
Zara CooperCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, 1 Brigham Circle, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
Tracey P KoehlmoosF. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD, 20184, USA.
Joel S WeissmanCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, 1 Brigham Circle, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USOslo University Hospital · NOUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

Defense Health Agency HU0001-11-1-0023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBundled payments for spine surgery, which is known for having high overall cost with wide variation, have been previously studied in older adults. However, there has been limited work examining bundled payments in working-age patients. We sought to identify the variation in the cost of spine surgery among working age adults in a large, national insurance claims database.

methodsWe queried the TRICARE claims database for all patients, aged 18-64, undergoing cervical and non-cervical spinal fusion surgery between 2012 and 2014. We calculated the case mix adjusted, price standardized payments for all aspects of care during the 60-, 90-, and 180-day periods post operation. Variation was assessed by stratifying Hospital Referral Regions into quintiles.

resultsAfter adjusting for case mix, there was significant variation in the cost of both cervical ($10,538.23, 60% of first quintile) and non-cervical ($20,155.59, 74%). Relative variation in total cost decreased from 60- to 180-days (63 to 55% and 76 to 69%). Index hospitalization was the primary driver of costs and variation for both cervical (1st-to-5th quintile range: $11,033-$19,960) and non-cervical ($18,565-$36,844) followed by readmissions for cervical ($0-$11,521) and non-cervical ($0-$13,932). Even at the highest quintile, post-acute care remained the lowest contribution to overall cost ($2070 & $2984).

conclusionsThere is wide variation in the cost of spine surgery across the United States for working age adults, driven largely by index procedure and readmissions costs. Our findings suggest that implementing episodes longer than the current 90-day standard would do little to better control cost variation.

Indexed as

Diagnosis-Related GroupsSubacute CareAdolescentAdultAgedHospitalizationHumansMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresUnited StatesYoung AdultBundled paymentsEpisode of carePayment reformSpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID33530994
PMCPMC7852105
OpenAlexW3127468897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.