Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33530968›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Knowledge and understanding of obstetric danger signs among pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic at the National Referral Hospital in Thimphu, Bhutan: a cross-sectional study.

Saran Tenzin Tamang, Thinley Dorji, Sonam Yoezer, Thinley Phuntsho, Phurb Dorji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saran Tenzin Tamang *Faculty of Postgraduate Medicine, Khesar Gyalpo University of Medical Sciences of Bhutan, Gongphel Lam, Thimphu, 11001, Bhutan. sarantenzintamang@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2619-7043
Thinley Dorji *Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Maharashtra University of Medical Sciences, Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4932-8704
Sonam YoezerFaculty of Postgraduate Medicine, Khesar Gyalpo University of Medical Sciences of Bhutan, Gongphel Lam, Thimphu, 11001, Bhutan.
Thinley PhuntshoKidu Mobile Medical Unit, His Majesty's People's Project, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Phurb DorjiKidu Mobile Medical Unit, His Majesty's People's Project, Thimphu, Bhutan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1058-4252

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe third Sustainable Development Goal for 2030 development agenda aims to reduce maternal and newborn deaths. Pregnant women's understanding of danger signs is an important factor in seeking timely care during emergencies. We assessed knowledge of obstetric danger signs using both recall and understanding of appropriate action required during obstetric emergencies.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at Bhutan's largest hospital in Thimphu. Recall was assessed against seven obstetric danger signs outlined in the Mother and Child Health Handbook (7 points). Understanding of danger signs was tested using 13 multiple choice questions (13 points). Knowledge was scored out of 20 points and reported as 'good' (≥80%), 'satisfactory' (60-79%) and 'poor' (< 60%). Correlation between participant characteristics and knowledge score as well as number of danger signs recalled was tested using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Association between knowledge score and participant characteristics was tested using t-tests (and Kruskal-Wallis test) for numeric variables. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics associated with the level of knowledge ('good' versus 'satisfactory' and 'poor' combined) were assessed with odds ratios using a log-binomial regression model. All results with p < 0.05 were considered significant.

resultsFour hundred and twenty-two women responded to the survey (response rate = 96.0%). Mean (±SD) knowledge score was 12 (±2.5). Twenty women (4.7%) had 'good' knowledge, 245 (58.1%) had 'satisfactory' knowledge and 157 (37.2%) had 'poor' knowledge. The median number of danger signs recalled was 2 (IQR 1, 3) while 68 women (20.3%) could not recall any danger signs. Most women were knowledgeable about pre-labour rupture of membranes (96.0%) while very few women were knowledgeable about spotting during pregnancy (19.9%). Both knowledge score and number of danger signs recalled had significant correlation with the period of gestation. Women with previous surgery on the reproductive tract had higher odds of having 'good' level of knowledge.

conclusionsMost pregnant women had 'satisfactory' knowledge score with poor explicit recall of danger signs. However, women recognized obstetric emergencies and identified the appropriate action warranted.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultBhutanCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareSurveys and QuestionnairesMaternal-child health servicesPregnancyPrenatal carePrenatal education

Identifiers

PMID33530968
PMCPMC7852084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.