ArticleBMC genomics2021
Impact of short-read sequencing on the misassembly of a plant genome.
Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- New annotations for three pea aphid genome assemblies allow comparative analyses of duplication and gene family evolution.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Characterization of tmexCD-toprJ-positive Klebsiella spp. from pediatric patients in a Chinese hospital.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Pan-genomics of polyploid crops: from complexity to breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- A comprehensive analysis of the impact of genomic imbalance on gene expression in a poplar aneuploidy population.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Advances in Functional Genomics for Exploring Abiotic Stress Tolerance Mechanisms in Cereals.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Variation of and associations with the depth and evenness of sequencing coverage in archived plastid genomes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Variation of and associations with the depth and evenness of sequencing coverage in archived plastid genomes.Research square · 2025Article
- Annotated Bioinformatic Pipelines for Genome Assembly and Annotation of Mitochondrial Genomes.Bio-protocol · 2025Article
- CLAW: An automated Snakemake workflow for the assembly of chloroplast genomes from long-read data.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- High quality genomes produced from single MinION flow cells clarify polyploid and demographic histories of critically endangered Fraxinus (ash) species.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Whole-genome Analyses Reveal Past Population Fluctuations and Low Genetic Diversities of the North Pacific Albatrosses.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- A gap-free genome assembly of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and detection of translocations induced by CRISPR-mediated mutagenesis.Plant communications · 2023Article
- Genome assembly composition of the String "ACGT" array: a review of data structure accuracy and performance challenges.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- Comparative Genomic Analysis Uncovered Evolution of Pathogenicity Factors, Horizontal Gene Transfer Events, and Heavy Metal Resistance Traits in Citrus Canker BacteriumFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAvailability of plant genome sequences has led to significant advances. However, with few exceptions, the great majority of existing genome assemblies are derived from short read sequencing technologies with highly uneven read coverages indicative of sequencing and assembly issues that could significantly impact any downstream analysis of plant genomes. In tomato for example, 0.6% (5.1 Mb) and 9.7% (79.6 Mb) of short-read based assembly had significantly higher and lower coverage compared to background, respectively.
resultsTo understand what the causes may be for such uneven coverage, we first established machine learning models capable of predicting genomic regions with variable coverages and found that high coverage regions tend to have higher simple sequence repeat and tandem gene densities compared to background regions. To determine if the high coverage regions were misassembled, we examined a recently available tomato long-read based assembly and found that 27.8% (1.41 Mb) of high coverage regions were potentially misassembled of duplicate sequences, compared to 1.4% in background regions. In addition, using a predictive model that can distinguish correctly and incorrectly assembled high coverage regions, we found that misassembled, high coverage regions tend to be flanked by simple sequence repeats, pseudogenes, and transposon elements.
conclusionsOur study provides insights on the causes of variable coverage regions and a quantitative assessment of factors contributing to plant genome misassembly when using short reads and the generality of these causes and factors should be tested further in other species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.