Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33530937›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

Impact of short-read sequencing on the misassembly of a plant genome.

Peipei Wang, Fanrui Meng, Bethany M Moore, Shin-Han Shiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peipei WangDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Fanrui MengDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Bethany M MooreDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Shin-Han ShiuDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. shius@msu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6470-235X

Funding

National Science Foundation DEB-1655386National Science Foundation IOS-1546617U.S. Department of Energy BER DE-SC0018409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAvailability of plant genome sequences has led to significant advances. However, with few exceptions, the great majority of existing genome assemblies are derived from short read sequencing technologies with highly uneven read coverages indicative of sequencing and assembly issues that could significantly impact any downstream analysis of plant genomes. In tomato for example, 0.6% (5.1 Mb) and 9.7% (79.6 Mb) of short-read based assembly had significantly higher and lower coverage compared to background, respectively.

resultsTo understand what the causes may be for such uneven coverage, we first established machine learning models capable of predicting genomic regions with variable coverages and found that high coverage regions tend to have higher simple sequence repeat and tandem gene densities compared to background regions. To determine if the high coverage regions were misassembled, we examined a recently available tomato long-read based assembly and found that 27.8% (1.41 Mb) of high coverage regions were potentially misassembled of duplicate sequences, compared to 1.4% in background regions. In addition, using a predictive model that can distinguish correctly and incorrectly assembled high coverage regions, we found that misassembled, high coverage regions tend to be flanked by simple sequence repeats, pseudogenes, and transposon elements.

conclusionsOur study provides insights on the causes of variable coverage regions and a quantitative assessment of factors contributing to plant genome misassembly when using short reads and the generality of these causes and factors should be tested further in other species.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingDNA Transposable ElementsGenomicsSequence Analysis, DNADNA Transposable ElementsGenome misassemblyMachine learningRead coverageSolanum lycopersicum

Identifiers

PMID33530937
PMCPMC7852129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.