Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33530730›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2021

Clients' Preferences for Family Involvement and Subsequent Family Contact Patterns Within OnTrackNY Early Psychosis Services.

Nev Jones, Cale Basaraba, Sarah Piscitelli, Thomas Jewell, Ilana Nossel, Iruma Bello, Franco Mascayano, Jennifer Scodes, Leslie Marino, Melanie Wall and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nev JonesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Division of Behavioral Health Services and Policies, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Basaraba, Piscitelli, Jewell, Nossel, Bello, Mascayano, Scodes, Marino, Wall, Dixon). Editor Emeritus Howard H. Goldman, M.D., Ph.D., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Cale BasarabaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Division of Behavioral Health Services and Policies, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Basaraba, Piscitelli, Jewell, Nossel, Bello, Mascayano, Scodes, Marino, Wall, Dixon). Editor Emeritus Howard H. Goldman, M.D., Ph.D., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Sarah PiscitelliDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Division of Behavioral Health Services and Policies, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Basaraba, Piscitelli, Jewell, Nossel, Bello, Mascayano, Scodes, Marino, Wall, Dixon). Editor Emeritus Howard H. Goldman, M.D., Ph.D., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Thomas JewellDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Division of Behavioral Health Services and Policies, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Basaraba, Piscitelli, Jewell, Nossel, Bello, Mascayano, Scodes, Marino, Wall, Dixon). Editor Emeritus Howard H. Goldman, M.D., Ph.D., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Ilana NosselDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Division of Behavioral Health Services and Policies, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Basaraba, Piscitelli, Jewell, Nossel, Bello, Mascayano, Scodes, Marino, Wall, Dixon). Editor Emeritus Howard H. Goldman, M.D., Ph.D., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Iruma BelloDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Division of Behavioral Health Services and Policies, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Basaraba, Piscitelli, Jewell, Nossel, Bello, Mascayano, Scodes, Marino, Wall, Dixon). Editor Emeritus Howard H. Goldman, M.D., Ph.D., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Franco MascayanoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Division of Behavioral Health Services and Policies, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Basaraba, Piscitelli, Jewell, Nossel, Bello, Mascayano, Scodes, Marino, Wall, Dixon). Editor Emeritus Howard H. Goldman, M.D., Ph.D., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Jennifer ScodesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Division of Behavioral Health Services and Policies, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Basaraba, Piscitelli, Jewell, Nossel, Bello, Mascayano, Scodes, Marino, Wall, Dixon). Editor Emeritus Howard H. Goldman, M.D., Ph.D., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Leslie MarinoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Division of Behavioral Health Services and Policies, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Basaraba, Piscitelli, Jewell, Nossel, Bello, Mascayano, Scodes, Marino, Wall, Dixon). Editor Emeritus Howard H. Goldman, M.D., Ph.D., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Melanie WallDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Division of Behavioral Health Services and Policies, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Basaraba, Piscitelli, Jewell, Nossel, Bello, Mascayano, Scodes, Marino, Wall, Dixon). Editor Emeritus Howard H. Goldman, M.D., Ph.D., served as decision editor on the manuscript.
Lisa B DixonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa (Jones); Division of Behavioral Health Services and Policies, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City (Basaraba, Piscitelli, Jewell, Nossel, Bello, Mascayano, Scodes, Marino, Wall, Dixon). Editor Emeritus Howard H. Goldman, M.D., Ph.D., served as decision editor on the manuscript.

Funding

OnTrackNY's LearningHealthcareSystemR01MH120597 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI BELLO, IRUMA, DIXON, LISA B. · 2019 to 2022
$7.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLittle is known about clients' preferences for family involvement and subsequent family contact in naturalistic, community-based coordinated specialty care (CSC) settings. The study's primary goal was to characterize clients' preferences and longitudinal patterns of family contact with providers across the OnTrackNY network in New York.

methodsClinical administrative data collected at 3-month intervals and spanning 21 OnTrackNY CSC sites were used to analyze the preferences of 761 clients at baseline (unconditional involvement, conditional involvement, or no involvement) and patterns of family contact with program staff (always, sometimes, never, or early discharge) and their correlates during the initial 12-month service period. Data from clients discharged before 12 months were included for comparison.

resultsAt baseline, most clients requested some form of family involvement (unconditional, 59%; conditional, 35%; and none, 6%). Within each 3-month assessment period, rates of family contact ranged from 73% to 84%. Variables associated with both client preferences and contact patterns included baseline insurance status, housing status, race, frequency of family contact, and employment. Clients' preferences for no or conditional family involvement were associated with higher rates of early discharge (i.e., before 1 year).

conclusionsStructuring family involvement around clients' preferences did not appear to negatively affect family contact, and for some clients, it seemed to bolster such contact. Additional mixed-methods research is needed to deepen the understanding of the contexts and reasoning underlying both client preferences for family involvement and subsequent levels of family contact.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersEmploymentHumansNew YorkPatient DischargeCoordinated specialty careFamily involvementFirst-episode psychosisOnTrackNY

Identifiers

PMID33530730
PMCPMC10281455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.