Trial reportCirculation. Heart failure2021
Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan in High-Risk Patients in the PIONEER-HF Trial.
Trial report in Circulation. Heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in acute decompensated heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Future cardiology · 2026Pooled it
- The role of sacubitril/valsartan in abnormal renal function patients combined with heart failure: a meta-analysis and systematic analysis.Renal failure · 2024Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of sacubitril-valsartan on left ventricular remodeling in patients with acute myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of low-dose sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- The Relationship between Angiotensin-Neprilysin Treatment, Echocardiographic Parameters, and NT-proBNP Levels in HFpEF Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Trial
- Article
- PRACTICE-HF: Implementation of an updated clinical protocol for acute heart failure.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026Article
- Pathophysiology of HFpEF: Insights from a Metabolic-Mitochondrial Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The efficacy and safety of left bundle branch pacing combined with sacubitril/valsartan or enalapril in the treatment of elderly coronary heart disease with chronic heart failure.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- MAGGIC risk score and drug-related adverse events of sacubitril/valsartan: Insights from the REVIEW-HF registry.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- Real-world comparative effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan versus RAS inhibition alone in patients with de novo heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Short-term outpatient follow-up of vericiguat treatment in patients hospitalized for heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Quantitative Evaluation of Cardiac Function Improvement by Conventional Cardiology Drug Regimens Combined with Sacubitril/Valsartan Sodium in Heart Failure Patients.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Sequencing Quadruple Therapy for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Does It Really Matter?Heart failure clinics · 2024Review
- Efficacy of Sacubitril Valsartan sodium tablets in patients with heart failure combined with pulmonary infection and long-term recurrence rate.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- New Challenges in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Managing Worsening Events.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Sequencing Quadruple Therapy for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Does It Really Matter?Cardiology clinics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn patients stabilized during hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (HF), initiation of sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril decreased the risk of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF without increasing the risk of adverse events. It is unknown whether potentially high-risk subpopulations have a similar risk-benefit profile.
methodsPIONEER-HF (Comparison of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Enalapril on Effect on NT-proBNP [N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide] in Patients Stabilized From an Acute HF Episode) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of in-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan (n=440) versus enalapril (n=441) in patients stabilized during hospitalization for acute decompensated HF. The composite of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF was adjudicated. Safety outcomes included worsening renal function, symptomatic hypotension, and hyperkalemia. We evaluated heterogeneity in the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on these efficacy and safety outcomes in selected subgroups of clinical concern: patients with baseline systolic blood pressure ≤118 mm Hg (median; n=448), baseline NT-proBNP >2701 pg/mL (median; n=395), estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/minute per 1.73 m
resultsThe relative risk reduction in cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF with sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril was consistent across all high-risk subgroups (
conclusionsIn high-risk subpopulations admitted for acute decompensated HF, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan after initial stabilization conferred a consistent reduction in cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for HF and was well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.