Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33530698›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2021

Shared Decision-Making for Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Rationale and Design of a Nationwide Dissemination and Implementation Project.

Jocelyn S Thompson, Monica D Fitzgerald, Larry A Allen, Colleen K McIlvennan, Russell E Glasgow, Matthew Wynia, Megan A Morris, John Beilenson, Chris Gherst, Dan D Matlock

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jocelyn S ThompsonAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (J.S.T., M.D.F., L.A.A., C.K.M., R.E.G., M.A.M., D.D.M.), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Monica D FitzgeraldAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (J.S.T., M.D.F., L.A.A., C.K.M., R.E.G., M.A.M., D.D.M.), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Larry A AllenAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (J.S.T., M.D.F., L.A.A., C.K.M., R.E.G., M.A.M., D.D.M.), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Colleen K McIlvennanAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (J.S.T., M.D.F., L.A.A., C.K.M., R.E.G., M.A.M., D.D.M.), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Russell E GlasgowAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (J.S.T., M.D.F., L.A.A., C.K.M., R.E.G., M.A.M., D.D.M.), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Matthew WyniaCenter for Bioethics and Humanities (M.W.), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Megan A MorrisAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (J.S.T., M.D.F., L.A.A., C.K.M., R.E.G., M.A.M., D.D.M.), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
John BeilensonStrategic Communications and Planning, Inc, Wayne, PA (J.B., C.G.).
Chris GherstStrategic Communications and Planning, Inc, Wayne, PA (J.B., C.G.).
Dan D MatlockAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (J.S.T., M.D.F., L.A.A., C.K.M., R.E.G., M.A.M., D.D.M.), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Outcomes Research Consortium · USGlobal Strategic Solutions (United States) · USStrategic Analysis (United States) · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Pragmatic Implementation Science Approaches to Assess and Enhance Value of Cancer Prevention and Control in Rural Primary CareP50CA244688 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI GLASGOW, RUSSELL E · 2019 to 2023
$4.9M
A Multicenter Trial of a Shared DECision Support Intervention for Patients offered implantable Cardioverter-DEfibrillators: DECIDE - ICD TrialR01HL136403 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MATLOCK, DANIEL D · 2017 to 2021
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244688NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has become a common medical option for patients with end-stage heart failure. Although patients' chances of survival may increase with an LVAD compared with medical therapy, the LVAD poses many risks and requires major lifestyle changes, thus making it a complex medical decision. Our prior work found that a decision aid for LVADs significantly increased decision quality for both patients and caregivers and was successfully implemented at 6 LVAD programs. Methods In follow-up, we are conducting a nationwide dissemination and implementation project, with the goal of implementing the decision aid at as many of the 176 LVAD programs in the United States as possible. Guided by the Theory of Diffusion of Innovations, the project consists of 4 phases: (1) building a network; (2) promoting adoption; (3) supporting implementation; and (4) encouraging maintenance. Developing an LVAD network of contacts occurs by using a national baseline survey of LVAD clinicians, existing professional relationships, and an internet-based strategy. A suite of resources targeted to promote adoption and support implementation of the decision aid into standard LVAD education processes are provided to the network. Evaluation is guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance framework, where clinician and patient surveys and qualitative interviews determine the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance achieved. Conclusions This project is a true dissemination study in that it targets the entire population of LVAD programs in the United States and is unique in its use of social marketing principles to promote adoption and implementation. The implementation plan is intended to serve as a test case and model for dissemination and implementation of other evidence-based decision support aids and strategies.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureHeart VentriclesCaregiversDecision Making, SharedHumanscaregiverdiffusion of innovationsheart-assist devices heart failureimplementation sciencemaintenance

Identifiers

PMID33530698
PMCPMC7887063
OpenAlexW3126295650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.