Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33530490›Full record

ArticleInsects2021

Puparia Cleaning Techniques for Forensic and Archaeo-Funerary Studies.

Jennifer Pradelli, Fabiola Tuccia, Giorgia Giordani, Stefano Vanin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer PradelliSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0528-1986
Fabiola TucciaSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4264-052X
Giorgia GiordaniDipartimento di Farmacia e Biotecnologie (FABIT), Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1826-7814
Stefano VaninDipartimento di Scienze della Terra dell'Ambiente e della Vita (DISTAV), Università di Genova, Corso Europa 26, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1676-5916

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diptera puparia may represent both in forensic and archaeo-funerary contexts the majority of the entomological evidence useful to reconstruct the peri and post-mortem events. Puparia identification is quite difficult due to the lack of identification keys and descriptions. In addition, external substances accumulated during the puparia permanence in the environment make the visualization of the few diagnostic characters difficult, resulting in a wrong identification. Six different techniques based on physical and chemical treatments have been tested for the removal of external substances from puparia to make identification at species level feasible. Furthermore, the effects of these methods on successful molecular analyses have also been tested as molecular identification is becoming an important tool to complement morphological identifications. The results of this study indicate that cleaning via warm water/soap, the sonication and treatment with a sodium hydroxide solution are the best methods to achieve a good quality of the samples.

Indexed as

Dipteraforensic entomologyfunerary archaeoentomologyidentification

Identifiers

PMID33530490
PMCPMC7912659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.