Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33530415›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Cutaneous Findings in Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

Bengisu Ozarslan, Teresa Russo, Giuseppe Argenziano, Claudia Santoro, Vincenzo Piccolo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cancer predisposition syndromes: an imaging review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Unveiling the complexity of neurofibromatosis type 1: Innovations in genetic understanding and clinical management. A narrative review.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Neurofibromatosis Type 1 : A General Review.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Biomarker Landscape in RASopathies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bengisu OzarslanDermatology Unit, Doku Medical Center, 34381 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9521-0147
Teresa RussoDermatology Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80100 Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe ArgenzianoDermatology Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80100 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1413-8214
Claudia SantoroDepartment of Woman, Neurofibromatosis Referral Centre, Child and of General and Specialised Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80100 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4547-0500
Vincenzo PiccoloDermatology Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80100 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7798-4368

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a complex autosomal dominant disorder associated with germline mutations in the NF1 tumor suppressor gene. NF1 belongs to a class of congenital anomaly syndromes called RASopathies, a group of rare genetic conditions caused by mutations in the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Generally, NF1 patients present with dermatologic manifestations. In this review the main features of café-au-lait macules, freckling, neurofibromas, juvenile xanthogranuloma, nevus anemicus and other cutaneous findings will be discussed.

Indexed as

café-au-lait maculescutaneousfrecklingjuvenile xanthogranulomaneurofibromaneurofibromatosis type 1nevus anemicusskin

Identifiers

PMID33530415
PMCPMC7865571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.