ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021
Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multidimensional proteomics and explainable AI feature selection identify cross-platform lung cancer molecular signature in blood plasma.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Multi Omics Integration in Colorectal Cancer: From Molecular Insights to Precision Oncology.Cancers · 2026Review
- Next-generation proteomics improves lung cancer risk prediction.Molecular oncology · 2026Article
- Unveiling Metabolic Signatures as Potential Biomarkers in Common Cancers: Insights from Lung, Breast, Colorectal, Liver, and Gastric Tumours.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Multi-Omic Associations of Epigenetic Age Acceleration Are Heterogeneously Shaped by Genetic and Environmental Influences.Aging cell · 2025Article
- Advances in colorectal cancer screening and detection: a narrative review on biomarkers, imaging and preventive strategies.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025Review
- Prognostic and diagnostic value of circulating IGFBP2 in pancreatic cancer.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2024Article
- Quantification of 782 Plasma Peptides by Multiplexed Targeted Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2023Article
- Development and validation of circulating protein signatures as diagnostic biomarkers for biliary tract cancer.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2023Article
- Methylation Status of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor (CRF) Receptor Genes in Colorectal Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood-based protein biomarkers are increasingly being explored as supplementary or efficient alternatives for population-based screening of colorectal cancer (CRC). The objective of the current study was to compare the diagnostic potential of proteins measured with different proteomic technologies. The concentrations of protein biomarkers were measured using proximity extension assays (PEAs), liquid chromatography/multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry (LC/MRM-MS) and quantibody microarrays (QMAs) in plasma samples of 56 CRC patients and 99 participants free of neoplasms. In another approach, proteins were measured in serum samples of 30 CRC cases and 30 participants free of neoplasm using immunome full-length functional protein arrays (IpAs). From all the measurements, 9, 6, 35 and 14 protein biomarkers overlapped for comparative evaluation of (a) PEA and LC/MRM-MS, (b) PEA and QMA, (c) PEA and IpA, and (d) LC/MRM-MS and IpA measurements, respectively. Correlation analysis was performed, along with calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) for assessing the diagnostic potential of each biomarker. DeLong's test was performed to assess the differences in AUC. Evaluation of the nine biomarkers measured with PEA and LC/MRM-MS displayed correlation coefficients >+0.6, similar AUCs and DeLong's
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.