Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33530295›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Exploration of Human Activity Recognition Using a Single Sensor for Stroke Survivors and Able-Bodied People.

Long Meng, Anjing Zhang, Chen Chen, Xingwei Wang, Xinyu Jiang, Linkai Tao, Jiahao Fan, Xuejiao Wu, Chenyun Dai, Yiyuan Zhang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A Review on Assisted Living Using Wearable Devices.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Long MengDepartment of Electronic Engineering, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8140-088X
Anjing ZhangDepartment of Neurological Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Rehabilitation Hospital of Shanghai, Kongjiang Branch, Shanghai 200093, China.
Chen ChenDepartment of Electronic Engineering, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Xingwei WangDepartment of Electronic Engineering, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Xinyu JiangDepartment of Electronic Engineering, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Linkai TaoDepartment of Electronic Engineering, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Jiahao FanDepartment of Electronic Engineering, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0514-1323
Xuejiao WuCenter of Rehabilitation Therapy, The First Rehabilitation Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200090, China.
Chenyun DaiDepartment of Electronic Engineering, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Yiyuan Zhange-Media Research Lab, Campus Group T, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4522-8354
Bart Vanrumstee-Media Research Lab, Campus Group T, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Toshiyo TamuraFuture Robotics Organization, Waseda University, 1-104, Totsuka-tyou, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8050, Japan.
Wei ChenDepartment of Electronic Engineering, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFE0112000Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project 2017SHZDZX01Shanghai Pujiang Program 19PJ1401100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Commonly used sensors like accelerometers, gyroscopes, surface electromyography sensors, etc., which provide a convenient and practical solution for human activity recognition (HAR), have gained extensive attention. However, which kind of sensor can provide adequate information in achieving a satisfactory performance, or whether the position of a single sensor would play a significant effect on the performance in HAR are sparsely studied. In this paper, a comparative study to fully investigate the performance of the aforementioned sensors for classifying four activities (walking, tooth brushing, face washing, drinking) is explored. Sensors are spatially distributed over the human body, and subjects are categorized into three groups (able-bodied people, stroke survivors, and the union of both). Performances of using accelerometer, gyroscope, sEMG, and their combination in each group are evaluated by adopting the Support Vector Machine classifier with the Leave-One-Subject-Out Cross-Validation technique, and the optimal sensor position for each kind of sensor is presented based on the accuracy. Experimental results show that using the accelerometer could obtain the best performance in each group. The highest accuracy of HAR involving stroke survivors was 95.84 ± 1.75% (mean ± standard error), achieved by the accelerometer attached to the extensor carpi ulnaris. Furthermore, taking the practical application of HAR into consideration, a novel approach to distinguish various activities of stroke survivors based on a pre-trained HAR model built on healthy subjects is proposed, the highest accuracy of which is 77.89 ± 4.81% (mean ± standard error) with the accelerometer attached to the extensor carpi ulnaris.

Indexed as

StrokeWearable Electronic DevicesHuman ActivitiesHumansSurvivorsWalkingdaily activity recognitionsensor placementsingle wearable sensorstroke

Identifiers

PMID33530295
PMCPMC7865661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.