Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33530000›Full record

Trial reportEBioMedicine2021

SARS-CoV-2 persistence is associated with antigen-specific CD8 T-cell responses.

Line K Vibholm, Stine S F Nielsen, Marie H Pahus, Giacomo S Frattari, Rikke Olesen, Rebecca Andersen, Ida Monrad, Anna H F Andersen, Michelle M Thomsen, Christina V Konrad and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in EBioMedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Line K VibholmDept. of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Electronic address: linvib@rm.dk.
Stine S F NielsenDept. of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Marie H PahusDept. of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Giacomo S FrattariDept. of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Rikke OlesenDept. of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Rebecca AndersenDept. of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Ida MonradDept. of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Anna H F AndersenDept. of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Michelle M ThomsenDept. of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Christina V KonradDept. of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Sidsel D AndersenDept. of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Jesper F HøjenDept. of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Jesper D GunstDept. of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Dept. of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Lars ØstergaardDept. of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Dept. of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Ole S SøgaardDept. of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Dept. of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Mariane H SchleimannDept. of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Martin TolstrupDept. of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Dept. of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUpon SARS-CoV-2 infection, most individuals develop neutralizing antibodies and T-cell immunity. However, some individuals reportedly remain SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive by pharyngeal swabs weeks after recovery. Whether viral RNA in these persistent carriers is contagious and stimulates SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses is unknown.

methodsThis cohort study was conducted between April 3

findingsWe enrolled 203 post-symptomatic participants with a previous RT-PCR-verified SARS-CoV-2 infection. At time point 1, a median of 23 days (range 15-44) after recovery, 26 individuals (12⋅8%) were PCR positive. At time point 2, 90 days (median, range 85-105) after recovery, 5 (5⋅3%) were positive. There was no difference in SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels between the PCR negative and positive group. The persistent PCR positive group however, had SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8 T-cell responses of significantly increased breadth and magnitude. Assisted contact tracing among persistent PCR positive individuals revealed zero new COVID-19 diagnoses among 757 close contacts.

interpretationPersistent pharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity in post-symptomatic individuals is associated with elevated cellular immune responses and thus, the viral RNA may represent replicating virus. However, transmission to close contacts was not observed indicating that persistent PCR positive individuals are not contagious at the post-symptomatic stage of the infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2RNA, ViralAntibodiesCD8 T cell responsesContact tracingImmunologyPersistent PCR positiveSARS-CoV-2Transmission

Identifiers

PMID33530000
PMCPMC7847186
OpenAlexW3127602500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.