Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33529527›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2021

Proteome Variation with Collagen Yield in Ancient Bone.

Noemi Procopio, Rachel J A Hopkins, Virginia L Harvey, Michael Buckley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Paleoproteomics.Chemical reviews · 2022
    Review
  5. A primer for ZooMS applications in archaeology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Noemi ProcopioForensic Science Research Group, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Northumbria University Newcastle, Ellison Building, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 8ST, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-7461-7586
Rachel J A HopkinsDepartment of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, MSC01-1040, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001, United States.
Virginia L HarveyManchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, U.K.
Michael BuckleyManchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-4166-8213
University of Manchester · GBUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S032878/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isotope analyses are some of the most common analytical methods applied to ancient bone, aiding the interpretation of past diets and chronology. For this, the evaluation of "collagen yield" (as defined in radiocarbon dating and stable isotope research) is a routine step that allows for the selection of specimens that are deemed adequate for subsequent analyses, with samples containing less than ∼1% "collagen yield" normally being used for isotopic analysis but discounted for radiocarbon dating. The aims of this study were to use proteomic methods of MALDI-TOF (matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-fligh mass spectrometry) and LC-ESI-MS/MS (liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry) to investigate the endogeneity of the dominant proteinaceous biomolecules within samples that are typically considered to contain poorly preserved protein. Taking 29 archaeological samples, we evaluated the proteome variability between different acid-soluble fractions removed prior to protein gelatinization and considered waste as part of the radiocarbon dating process. We then correlated these proteomes against the commonly used "collagen yield" proxy for preservation. We found that these waste fractions contained a significant amount of both collagenous and noncollagenous proteins (NCPs) but that the abundance of these was not correlated with the acquired "collagen yield". Rather than a depleted protein load as would be expected from a low "collagen yield", the variety of the extracted NCPs was comparable with that commonly obtained from ancient samples and included informative proteins useful for species identification, phylogenetic studies, and potentially even for isotopic analyses, given further method developments. Additionally, we did not observe any correlation between "collagen yield" and peptide mass fingerprint success or between the different fractions taken from the same sample but at different radiocarbon pretreatment stages. Overall, these findings highlight the value in retaining and analyzing sample fractions that are otherwise discarded as waste during the radiocarbon dating process but more importantly, that low "collagen yield" specimens that are often misinterpreted by archaeologists as being devoid of protein can still yield useful molecular sequence-based information.

Indexed as

ProteomeProteomicsArchaeologyBone and BonesCollagenPhylogenySpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationTandem Mass SpectrometryCollagenProteomeancient bonecollagenNCPsproteomicsradiocarbon datingstable isotopes

Identifiers

PMID33529527
PMCPMC7944572
OpenAlexW3128840143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.