Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33529407›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2021

The role of donor-unrestricted T-cells, innate lymphoid cells, and NK cells in anti-mycobacterial immunity.

Paula Ruibal, Linda Voogd, Simone A Joosten, Tom H M Ottenhoff

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Enrichment of CD4iScience · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Enrichment of a CD4bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. iScience · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. HLA-E/Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paula RuibalDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3217-4497
Linda VoogdDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0523-8929
Simone A JoostenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Tom H M OttenhoffDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

HLA-E restricted T-cell immunity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infectionR01AI141315 · NIAID · LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI JOOSTEN, SIMONE ANNE · 2019 to 2022
$1.7M
In depth characterization of Mtb specific HLA-E restricted human CD8+ T-cellsR21AI127133 · NIAID · LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI OTTENHOFF, TOM · 2016 to 2017
$281k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI141315NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI127133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination strategies against mycobacteria, focusing mostly on classical T- and B-cells, have shown limited success, encouraging the addition of alternative targets. Classically restricted T-cells recognize antigens presented via highly polymorphic HLA class Ia and class II molecules, while donor-unrestricted T-cells (DURTs), with few exceptions, recognize ligands via genetically conserved antigen presentation molecules. Consequently, DURTs can respond to the same ligands across diverse human populations. DURTs can be activated either through cognate TCR ligation or via bystander cytokine signaling. TCR-driven antigen-specific activation of DURTs occurs upon antigen presentation via non-polymorphic molecules such as HLA-E, CD1, MR1, and butyrophilin, leading to the activation of HLA-E-restricted T-cells, CD1-restricted T-cells, mucosal-associated invariant T-cells (MAITs), and TCRγδ T-cells, respectively. NK cells and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), which lack rearranged TCRs, are activated through other receptor-triggering pathways, or can be engaged through bystander cytokines, produced, for example, by activated antigen-specific T-cells or phagocytes. NK cells can also develop trained immune memory and thus could represent cells of interest to mobilize by novel vaccines. In this review, we summarize the latest findings regarding the contributions of DURTs, NK cells, and ILCs in anti-M tuberculosis, M leprae, and non-tuberculous mycobacterial immunity and explore possible ways in which they could be harnessed through vaccines and immunotherapies to improve protection against Mtb.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisHumansImmunity, InnateKiller Cells, NaturalReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltadonor-unrestricted T-cellsHLA-Einnate lymphoid cellsMycobacterium tuberculosisNK cellsvaccine

Identifiers

PMID33529407
PMCPMC8154655
OpenAlexW3128226646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.