Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33529363›Full record

ReviewEpilepsia2021

Can Big Data guide prognosis and clinical decisions in epilepsy?

Xiaojin Li, Licong Cui, Guo-Qiang Zhang, Samden D Lhatoo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaojin LiDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2273-186X
Licong CuiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5549-8780
Guo-Qiang ZhangDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3663-1109
Samden D LhatooDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0260-3855

Funding

SUDEP Translational Research Alliance (SUTRA): Autonomic and Imaging Biomarkers of SUDEP; SUTRA 3 of 7U01NS090407 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI DIEHL, BEATE, HARPER, RONALD MARVEN · 2014 to 2018
$7.3M
The Center for SUDEP Research (CSR), Informatics and Data Analytics Core (IDAC)U01NS090408 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ZHANG, GUO-QIANG · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
An informatics framework for SUDEP Risk Marker Identification and Risk AssessmentR01NS116287 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CUI, LICONG · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116287NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090407NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Big Data is no longer a novel concept in health care. Its promise of positive impact is not only undiminished, but daily enhanced by seemingly endless possibilities. Epilepsy is a disorder with wide heterogeneity in both clinical and research domains, and thus lends itself to Big Data concepts and techniques. It is therefore inevitable that Big Data will enable multimodal research, integrating various aspects of "-omics" domains, such as phenome, genome, microbiome, metabolome, and proteome. This scope and granularity have the potential to change our understanding of prognosis and mortality in epilepsy. The scale of new discovery is unprecedented due to the possibilities promised by advances in machine learning, in particular deep learning. The subsequent possibilities of personalized patient care through clinical decision support systems that are evidence-based, adaptive, and iterative seem to be within reach. A major objective is not only to inform decision-making, but also to reduce uncertainty in outcomes. Although the adoption of electronic health record (EHR) systems is near universal in the United States, for example, advanced clinical decision support in or ancillary to EHRs remains sporadic. In this review, we discuss the role of Big Data in the development of clinical decision support systems for epilepsy care, prognostication, and discovery.

Indexed as

Big DataDecision Support Systems, ClinicalElectronic Health RecordsEpilepsyHumansPrognosisclinical decision support systemdata sciencemachine learning

Identifiers

PMID33529363
PMCPMC8011949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.