Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33529248›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Antibiofilm and antipersister activity of acetic acid against extensively drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAW1.

Madhumita S Tawre, Ekta E Kamble, Shital N Kumkar, Mansura S Mulani, Karishma R Pardesi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. In Vivo Antimicrobial Activity of Nisin Z AgainstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Infection & chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Characterization of NovelMicrobiology spectrum · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Synergistic and antibiofilm potential ofFrontiers in chemistry · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Madhumita S TawreDepartment of Microbiology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Ekta E KambleDepartment of Microbiology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Shital N KumkarDepartment of Microbiology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Mansura S MulaniDepartment of Microbiology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Karishma R PardesiDepartment of Microbiology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7535-6317
Savitribai Phule Pune University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an ESKAPE pathogen associated with difficult-to-treat burn wound and surgical-site infections. This study aimed to characterise an extensively drug resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa isolate (designated PAW1) and to investigate the antibiofilm and antipersister effect of acetic acid on PAW1. PAW1 was identified using biotypic (VITEK) and genotypic (16S rDNA) analysis. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and disc susceptibility testing showed high level resistance against all antibiotics from classes including beta lactams, cephems, carbapenems and fluoroquinolones. It was therefore identified as extensively drug resistant (XDR), showing resistance to all antibiotics except for, aminoglycoside (gentamicin and netilmicin) and lipopeptides (polymyxin B). Time kill assays showed antibiotic tolerant, persister cell formation in presence of 100X MICs of gentamicin and polymyxin B. Other virulence traits such as ability to produce lipase, protease, haemolysin, and siderophores and to form biofilms were additional factors which may contribute to its pathogenicity. PAW1 showed promising susceptibility against acetic acid with MIC and minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration of 0.156% (v/v). Percent viability of PAW1 was dependent on dose and treatment time of acetic acid. 0.625% acetic acid treatment of 5 minutes was effective in killing >90% planktonic cells showing lesser toxicity to L929 cells (IC50 = 0.625%). Biofilm disruption caused due to acetic acid was also dose dependent, showing 40.57% disruption after treatment with 0.625% acetic acid for 5 minutes. FESEM imaging and live dead staining of planktonic and biofilm forms of PAW1 confirmed that acetic acid treatment caused 19.04% of cell shrinkage and disruption of extracellular matrix resulting in killing of cells. Antipersister activity of acetic acid was demonstrated by showing complete killing of PAW1 at 4X MIC. Overall, this study characterised an XDR isolate P. aeruginosa showing resistance and tolerance to various antibiotics. Antipersister and antibiofilm effect of acetic acid demonstrates the importance of forgotten topical agents as an effective strategy to treat XDR pathogens.

Indexed as

Acetic AcidAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCell LineCell SurvivalDrug Resistance, BacterialMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityPhylogenyPlanktonPseudomonas aeruginosaTime FactorsAcetic AcidAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID33529248
PMCPMC7853517
OpenAlexW3127944707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.