Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33529201›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Cost-effectiveness of the long-acting regimen cabotegravir plus rilpivirine for the treatment of HIV-1 and its potential impact on adherence and viral transmission: A modelling study.

Ben Parker, Tom Ward, Olivia Hayward, Ian Jacob, Erin Arthurs, Debbie Becker, Sarah-Jane Anderson, Vasiliki Chounta, Nicolas Van de Velde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ben ParkerHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Pontprennau, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Tom WardHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Pontprennau, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Olivia HaywardHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Pontprennau, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9944-5450
Ian JacobHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Pontprennau, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Erin ArthursHealth Economics & Outcomes Research, GlaxoSmithKline, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Debbie BeckerQuadrant Health Economics Inc, Cambridge, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah-Jane AndersonValue Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
Vasiliki ChountaGlobal Health Outcomes, ViiV Healthcare Ltd, Brentford, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
Nicolas Van de VeldeGlobal Health Outcomes, ViiV Healthcare Ltd, Brentford, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) · GBViiV Healthcare (United Kingdom) · GBGlaxoSmithKline (Canada) · CAGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCombination antiretroviral therapy (cART) improves outcomes for people living with HIV (PLWH) but requires adherence to daily dosing. Suboptimal adherence results in reduced treatment effectiveness, increased costs, and greater risk of resistance and onwards transmission. Treatment with long-acting (LA), injection-based ART administered by healthcare professionals (directly observed therapy (DOT)) eliminates the need for adherence to daily dosing and may improve clinical outcomes. This study reports the cost-effectiveness of the cabotegravir plus rilpivirine LA regimen (CAB+RPV LA) and models the potential impact of LA DOT therapies.

methodsParameterisation was performed using pooled data from recent CAB+RPV LA Phase III trials. The analysis was conducted using a cohort-level hybrid decision-tree and state-transition model, with states defined by viral load and CD4 cell count. The efficacy of oral cART was adjusted to reflect adherence to daily regimens from published data. A Canadian health service perspective was adopted.

resultsCAB+RPV LA is predicted to be the dominant intervention when compared to oral cART, generating, per 1,000 patients treated, lifetime cost-savings of $1.5 million, QALY and life-year gains of 107 and 138 respectively with three new HIV cases averted.

conclusionsEconomic evaluations of LA DOTs need to account for the impact of adherence and HIV transmission. This study adds to the existing literature by incorporating transmission and using clinical data from the first LA DOT regimen. Providing PLWH and healthcare providers with novel modes of ART administration, enhancing individualisation of treatment, may facilitate the achievement of UNAIDS 95-95-95 objectives.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisModels, StatisticalAnti-HIV AgentsDiketopiperazinesDrug InteractionsHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansPyridonesRilpivirineTreatment Adherence and ComplianceTreatment OutcomeAnti-HIV AgentscabotegravirDiketopiperazinesPyridonesRilpivirine

Identifiers

PMID33529201
PMCPMC7853524
OpenAlexW3126154687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.