SynthesisPloS one2021
Pentraxin 3 is more accurate than C-reactive protein for Takayasu arteritis activity assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corticosteroid monotherapy for the management of Takayasu arteritis-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Rheumatology international · 2021Pooled it
- Management of Takayasu Arteritis - A 2026 Update.Current rheumatology reports · 2026Review
- Beyond clinical criteria: emerging biomarkers and advanced imaging in the diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of vasculitides.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of Takayasu arteritis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2025Review
- Beyond the Pulselessness: A Multifaceted Case of Takayasu Arteritis With Aneurysmal Complications and Extensive Upper Limb Vascular Occlusion in a 40-Year-Old Female.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Pentraxin 3 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Pentraxin-3 and Outcomes in CKD: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Kidney medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Outcome Measures and Biomarkers for Disease Assessment in Takayasu Arteritis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Biomarker Changes and Molecular Signatures Associated with Takayasu Arteritis Following Treatment with Glucocorticoids and Tofacitinib.Journal of inflammation research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsWhether the circulating levels of pentraxin 3 (PTX3), an acute phase reactant (APR), are higher in active Takayasu arteritis (TAK), and if so, whether PTX3 is more accurate than C-reactive protein (CRP) in TAK activity assessment has been investigated in this study. STUDY
designResearch works such as PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and two Chinese literature databases (CNKI and WanFang) were searched for studies conducted till August 30th, 2019. Two investigators searched the studies independently, who evaluated the quality of the study using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) and extracted data. Pooled standard mean difference (SMD) and diagnostic indexes, with a 95% confidence interval (CI), were calculated using a random-effect model.
resultsTotally, 8 studies involving 473 TAK (208 active and 265 inactive TAK) patients and 252 healthy controls were eventually included in the meta-analysis. PTX3 level in the blood in active TAK patients were found to be higher than that in dormant TAK with pooled SMD of 0.761 (95% CI = 0.38-1.14, p<0.0001; I2 = 68%, p of Q test = 0.003). And there was no publication bias. Among the 8 studies, 5 studies identified active TAK with both PTX3 and CRP. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values of PTX3 in active TAK diagnosis were higher than those of CRP (0.78 [95% CI = 0.65-0.87] vs. 0.66 [95% CI = 0.53-0.77], p = 0.012; 0.85 [95% CI = 0.77-0.90] vs. 0.77 [95% CI = 0.56-0.90], p = 0.033; 0.88 [95% CI = 0.85-0.90] vs. 0.75 [95% CI = 0.71-0.79], p < 0.0001). It showed potential publication bias using Egger's test (p of PTX3 = 0.031 and p of CRP = 0.047).
conclusionsPTX3 might be better than CRP in the assessment of TAK activity. Yet, it should be cautious before clinical use for moderate heterogeneity and potential publication bias of the meta-analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.